Writing Shotgun

AN ELOQUENT PLEA FOR GOOD GOVERNMENT VS. THE MEN IN VERY FINE SUITS

 

WHO DO YOU THINK WON THE NIGHT?

A row of men in very fine suits — representatives of the Port of Long Beach, including executive director Richard D. Steinke and Harbor Commissioners Mario Cordero, Dr. Mike Walter and Nick Sramek — sat shoulder-to-shoulder in the third row of the Long Beach City Council chambers last night.

They sat there for hours, staring stone-faced at the nine-member council, while Fifth District representative Gerrie Schipske asked her colleagues to consider increasing the Port’s annual payment to the city’s stressed-to-buckling budget.

Late into the evening, just before the council voted, retired assistant city attorney Jim McCabe came to the podium as a private citizen and quietly made this eloquent plea for good government:

“For approximately 10 years, I handled Tidelands matters for the City Attorney’s office. Basically, I only want to speak on the question of increasing the percentage amount from 10 percent to 20 percent, and my message is a kind of populist one, in a way.

“We all know — we live in Long Beach — that influential people with perfectly understandable self-interests are associated with the Port and the shipping industry. They are big industries in the city of Long Beach, and they’d just as soon the percentage was zero, not 10 percent.

“Councilwoman Schipske proposed raising the percentage payable to the Tidelands to 15 percent. She also proposed asking Sacramento to let Long Beach transfer an additional five percent to the City’s General Fund for use citywide.

“The current 10 percent limit has been in the City’s Charter forever. It is, for all practical purposes, an accident of ancient history. So the question is not whether 10 percent is written in stone somewhere and can’t be changed. The question is what the right percentage is. And typically, the Tidelands for beaches and recreation and marinas is desperately in need of development and funding, and there’s no tangible reason that I see that it shouldn’t go from 10 to 20 percent.

“With the utmost respect, I suggest to the Council that it should prove once and for all that the Port is a department of the City of Long Beach, as Mr. [current City Attorney Bob] Shannon would tell you, and that the city is not run by these influential people, no matter how understandable their motitivations for self-interest.

“Those people give, as I say, give lots of money to political campaigns. And I know that’s enticing and intoxicating stuff, but we as a city need to do what’s right for — I hate to use the word “crown jewel” — our beaches and marinas and beachfront recreational facilities.

“I think it’s a shame that some people who have originally run on a platform of progressive actions now seem to be the darlings of the Chamber of Commerce and the shipping industry.

“But do the right thing. Pick the right number, and don’t be afraid of offending the powers that be. Thank you very much.”

Moments later, the council voted, 6-3 — dissenting were Tonia Reyes Uranga, Rae Gabelich and Schipske — to reject sending the proposal to a committee for further examination and discussion.

Discussion? No one in the majority — Bonnie Lowenthal, Suja Lowenthal, Gary DeLong, Patrick O’Donnell, Dee Andrews, Val Lerch — said a word during Schipske’s entire presentation. They didn’t ask a question. The didn’t offer a comment.

They sat, staring straight ahead, as stone-faced and silent as … as … as the five men in the very fine suits sitting shoulder-to-shoulder, watching them from the third row.

When the vote was over, the five men rose — satisfied — and left the council chamber. The six council members who had satisfied them stayed in their seats to continue running the city.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

COMMENTS

  1. 1

    great work dave

     
  2. 2

    Excelent article. Keep up the good reporting. Mike

     
  3. 3

    ooooh….what happens next? *sizzle-pop!*

     
  4. 4

    its always enlightening when you find out just how little a politician gets to sell us out.

     
  5. 5

    see comments two articles ago. If Schipske could grow a personality, she might get further. It’s as simple as that. She’s the wrong person to hook your cause to, no matter how worthy the issue. A Schipske-led charge will end up where they take the drek the clean off the beaches. She ain’t got no political capital.

     
  6. 6

    Whiner I agree with you on that, she has a lot of very solid ideas, does a good job of communicating with her blog, but there seems to be something missing…. Can you imagine her proposal not going to committee for discussion if presented by DeLong or one of the Lowenthals? (p.s. anything to rumors she has been applying for city attorney jobs in the OC?)

     
  7. 7

    “Can you imagine her proposal not going to committee for discussion if presented by DeLong or one of the Lowenthals?”
    …No, but then again, I can’t imagine any of them having balls enough to put this on the agenda.

    “If Schipske could grow a personality, she might get further… She ain’t got no political capital.”
    Style again wins out over substance. It’s the sad story of Long Beach… so many are so used to the aggressive mediocrity that our council routinely negotiates amongst itself, that anyone who leads the charge for common sense change gets labeled an iconoclast.

     
  8. 8

    I’ve no problem with the above, but it doesn’t matter how many great ideas she has, if her personality limitation/deficit blocks implementation. You’ve got to combine the two: style it might be, but getting some doesn’t mean you sacrifice substance in the process.

    So let’s buy Schipske some style, then she’ll her substance will get closer to reality…who wants to chip in?

     

Leave a Reply

DISCLAIMER: We do not screen comments in advance, but we do reserve the right to delete or edit any we find inappropriate. Please note that commenters are free to use whatever name(s) they choose.

 

© 2007-2008 Seven Days Publishing LLC.