As John Canalis writes in this morning’s Press-Telegram, Cress is charged with one count of murder–and three additional felony counts: being a felon in possession of a firearm, being a felon in possession of ammunition and marijuana cultivation–in the Jan. 21, 2007 death of Jacob T. Walker, 15, of Paramount.

He admits “lying to sheriff’s investigators, telling them that he fired a pellet gun, rather than the .22 caliber pistol used to kill” Walker, Canalis writes. “But the 61-year-old truck driver disputes the charge against him: murder.”

In pre-trial hearing testimony and law enforcement interrogations, and an interview with the Press-Telegram, Canalis writes, “Cress argues that he was defending himself and his pets.”

Is that a defensible position? Writes Canalis: “Legal principles that allow a homeowner to use a weapon to protect the inside of a home do not apply in the same way to the backyard - at least in California.”

Cress says he woke at about 6 a.m. on Jan. 21, 2007, “to the sound of his three dogs - a German shepherd, a collie and a poodle - barking in his backyard at 8572 Park St.”

“He told his wife, Roxanne Cress, to call 911. He grabbed a pistol and went outside,” Canalis writes. “It was still dark, save for a 300-watt security light.”

On his patio, Cress says he saw two shadowy figures–later determined to be Walker and 25-year-old Duane Berry, his half-brother.

“I told them, `Get on the ground,’ ” Cress said. “They said, ‘(expletive) you!’ and started coming at me. So I fired two shots at the back fence …

“Immediately, he goes over he fence, and he was gone. Then the one near the patio came toward me with a hammer, and then half-assed tried to hit me. Then he was gone.”

“[Cress] said the burglars were there to steal his marijuana,” Canalis writes.

“They had been taking plants over the fence,” Cress told Canalis.

(According to a memo by one of Cress’s former defense attorneys, the defendant is a certified “caregiver” who can “legally grow, harvest, process and sell marijuana to others with permission from doctors,” Canalis notes.)

And that was it, for a short while. Los Angeles County Sheriff’s deputies arrived, but according to court papers, Canalis writes, Cress declined to file a report.

The deputies came back about 40 minutes later, and arrested Cress on suspicion of murder: Walker had been hit twice, and had died at Lakewood Regional Medical Center.

“I didn’t mean to hit him,” Cress told Canalis in an interview at Los Angeles County Men’s Central Jail. “All I wanted to do is scare him.”

But now, Walker is dead–a year after going on his first date at age 14. They went Rollerblading.

“All I know is my son was shot in the back, and I watched him die,” Walker’s mother, Yolanda Rice of Paramount told the P-T.

The case comes back to Norwalk Superior Court on Aug. 8 , at which point Superior Court Judge Roger Ito (any relation to Lance Ito?) will very likely set a trial date.

Tags: California, Duane Berry, Jacob T. Walker, Jerry Cress, lakewood, Lakewood Regional Medical Center, Lance Ito, Long Beach, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Norwalk Superior Court, Norwalk Superior Court Judge Roger Ito, Paramount, press telegram, Rollerblades, Roxanne Cress, Southern California, The District Weekly, Theo Douglas, Yolanda Rice

Viewing 5 Comments

Juan Pardell 2 months ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

If Mr. Cress, didn't have any credibility issues, most law abiding citizens would back his actions. Throw out all the disclaimers. If someone tresspasses on your property, you have the right to defend yourself.

reply edit reblog flag

jacob rip 2 weeks ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

my boyfriend did not need to die

reply edit reblog flag

Jonathan 2 months ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

Its pretty obvious to me that all parties involved are dirty, to some extent. And so it annoys me when I hear family members from both sides trying to humanize them, as if they are good people, which they clearly are NOT.

The defendant has a criminal record, and grows weed in his backyard. He keeps some dogs and a gun on hand to prevent break-ins and theft. He and his efforts in horticulture are a blight in that neighborhood - only a lawyer would ever argue differently.

The 'victim' was a youngster who was trespassing with the intent to steal some "trees" (as his recently incarcerated cohort explained in the Press Telegram article I read today). It would not surprise me to find out that he too had some sort of a juvenile record.

So my complaint is this: Don't tell me that the victim liked to rollerblade, feed stray dogs, and watch TV. Don't tell me that the defendant was a quiet, peaceful man. That besets the fact that they were both up to absolutely NO GOOD. They did not contribute to society. They did not think about others before themselves. They are not good people. They are (or were) petty criminals.

So mourn the tragedy. Mourn the senselessness. And maybe try to learn something from it. But issuing a benign character witness on their behalf, in light of the events they caused and participated in, is nothing short of naive.

reply edit reblog flag

Juan Pardell 2 months ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

Jonathan --- So, in regards to this incident, is your basic philosophy simply stating to ,"Kill them all?"

reply edit reblog flag

jacob rip 2 weeks ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

my boyfriend didn't deserve to die

reply edit reblog flag