News

WHERE IN THE WORLD IS ROBERT GARCIA?

 

First District Councilman says he’ll post his appointment calendar online


PHOTO by JOHN GILHOOLEY

Don’t even waste your time asking Robert Garcia what he’s doing on his first full day—or any other day, for that matter‚ as the 1st District’s representative on the Long Beach City Council. Just go online to robertgarcia.com. It’s all there.

Garcia’s first act after his swearing-in ceremony Tuesday night as the city’s newest—and at age 31, its youngest ever—council member was to post his appointment calendar on his Web site. The calendars of his staff members are up there, too.

“These calendars will let people know who I’m meeting with, when I’m meeting with them and what I’m meeting with them about,” says Garcia. “The same information will be available about my staff; I think that’s just as important in a city with part-time council members, where full-time staff members do so much of the work.”

Garcia’s small move marks a potentially consequential shift in the debate about government transparency in Long Beach, one of the state’s few major cities without an ordinance that regulates lobbyists. Just last November the city council voted, 7-2, against a proposal that would have forced lobbyists to register and report their contacts with city officials. Only Gerrie Schipske and Bonnie Lowenthal—Garcia’s predecessor, now gone to the California assembly—voted in favor of the ordinance.

Did we say this is a small move?

“I think it’s a huge step in open government, one that begins a new philosophy about where Long Beach is going,” says Garcia. “The future of Long Beach is progressive, and that means giving residents access to city hall. Putting my calendar online is a move toward balancing things out to break this old-boys’ network that needs to be broken.”

The city has a long and infamous reputation for behind-the-scenes dealings and sweet treatment of insiders, and prominent monuments to the practice are everywhere—from the Queen Mary, Aquarium of the Pacific, the Pike at Rainbow Harbor and the about-to-open Residence Inn on Queensway Drive, to the out-of-balance sheets of the Long Beach Museum of Art and the recent lopsided leases and land swaps city officials have negotiated with developer Tom Dean.

Interestingly, Garcia’s solution is the one preferred by local lobbyists, some of whom have been a part of the old-boys’ equation.

“All city officials need to do is open their calendars and put them on the Internet,” lobbyist Mike Murchison—whose client list of heavy-hitters includes Dean—told a meeting of the council’s Election Oversight Committee last Aug. 5. “That would solve the problem beautifully without adding another layer of bureaucracy—and forcing taxpayers to pick up the tab.”

Garcia insists the lobbyists’ perspective played no part in his decision.

“The first time I thought about the lobbyist connection,” he says, “is when you mentioned it.”

Diane Ripley, who prefers to describe her lobbying work as community outreach, says she appreciates Garcia’s move to open his calendar on a professional and philosophical basis.

“I think it’s a really responsible position to take,” she says. “Councilman Garcia recognizes it’s up to elected officials to be answerable to their constituents. Publishing my calendar? What would that do? It doesn’t really create transparency for the public official. To me, that’s skirting the issue.”

Previously, some council members have objected to publishing their calendars over fear for their privacy and out of concern that they might overburden their staffs. “Now that I’m going to be a mom, alone, living with a child, I now feel differently,” 2nd District Councilwoman Suja Lowenthal said last summer, shortly after separating from her husband. “I don’t want people to know where [my son] is. I don’t want them to know that he goes to 49er Camp at x-hour, you know? All of that is on my calendar now—my son’s doctor appointments, dentist appointments—so that my staff is aware that if I’m not available, it’s because I’m doing that. So that’s a concern I have.”

Said ex-council member Bonnie Lowenthal: “Quite frankly, it’s quite burdensome for council members to provide that kind of detailed information.”

Schipske was doing a primitive version of Garcia’s reporting in 2007, when she used her blog (schipskedistrict5journal.com) to post a weekly list of the meetings she’d attended. But she stopped—“Nobody else was doing it,” she explained, “and it was very time consuming for me to type in everything by hand”—and has since focused her efforts on a lobbyist registration ordinance, which she says she will ask the city council to put on the ballot for the 2010 election so citizens can vote on it.

Garcia says he envisions a more expansive, proactive version of what Schipske was doing—and, hopefully, one that is a little less labor intensive.

“The ideal is that someone will be able to go to my Web site, click on the calendar and see the same thing we see in my council office—an advance, up-to-the-minute list of my appointments that is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,” he says. “It will start on my personal Web site, but I intend to transfer it to the city site as soon as we can figure out the technology. It’s definitely a commitment of time and resources, but I know it’s the right thing to do.”

Garcia chuckles a little bit.

“Look, this is not a new idea,” he says. “It’s just a new idea to Long Beach.”

As proof and as an example of what he has in mind, Garcia points to the Web site of the city of San Jose (sanjoseca.gov/council.asp), where residents need only to click on the word “calendar” right below the photo of the mayor or city council to see what their elected officials will be up to, sometimes months in advance.

There are limits to the disclosure, says Garcia, and the effort may test the limits of his staff.

“People are not going to know if I’m going to get a haircut,” he says—an interesting example for the always well-coifed councilman. “No one is going to know about my doctor’s appointments. Everyone has a right to privacy.

“I agree that it’s definitely a commitment of time and resources, too. But I know it’s the right thing to do—and I’m going to get it done. Old Long Beach has had its heyday, and this is my way of marking a new day.”

Tags: , , , ,

  • a reasonable resident
    Laurence: City council members dont initiate state ballots. What on Earth are you talking about? For a gadlfy/activist/loudmouth you sure are clueless about the BASICS

    Paul: The council did not vote to bus in homeless people, nor did it vote to open a homeless service center. Rather, it voted to RETAIN LOCAL CONTROL over a homeless service center that we are MANDATED BY FEDERAL LAW to create. The choice was not either to have the center or not have it; the choice was whether to have some control over it, which would include the ability to turn more than half the former Army base into a POLICE STATION, something that likely would NOT happen if we fell out of compliance with USHUD requirements.

    Educate yourselves before you start spouting off; you sound stupid.
  • Laurence Goodhue
    RE THE HOMELESS CENTER:

    Paul is correct-viz...at the end of the day what the Council did was to have the homeless
    and addle minded(not unlike the individual that took issue with Paul's response)including
    the dangerous bussed into an area which has a large residential community including
    children.

    It is my understanding that the protocols for BRAC would allow the center to be sited
    elsewhere IF it could be demonstrated that it better serve those what we should
    certainly help.

    This country,long ago,stopped moving people onto reservations.The people that BRAC
    would help are better of in an environment that is conducive to main streaming them
    back into society.That area offers nothing in that vein.

    In this 50 square mile City,certainly,a location conducive such mainstreaming can be
    found.

    Laurence Goodhue
  • Laurence B, Goodhue
    NOTE TO" REASONABLE??? RESIDENT:

    If you will check Wolley Segap you can probably find a ophthalmologist who is
    also is also a proctologist.My sense you might find such helpful.

    There is nothing to preclude any citizen from the State of California to get the
    process started.When one is elected to office they do not give up any rights
    granted to them by the Constitution of the State or Nation.

    On a routine basis this Council,as do their counterparts in City's through out the
    State pass either sense of the Council Resolutions;or vote to send letters to a wide
    range of bodies on a full range of issues.

    In the instant case there is nothing to preclude Mr.Garcia from doing any of the above
    either as a private individual or Council member.The Jarvis Foundation among many
    would be a logical first choice.
  • Laurence B. Goodhue
    More frighting than watching Oropeza-certainly the antithesis of a Fulbright scholar-
    was Garcia's pledge to work for the COMMON GOOD!!!

    That is the last thing that district or the City needs!!!

    What is needed are those to work for the UNCOMMON GOOD!!!

    If people want common good-go south of our borders or to the land of Richardson's
    new fast friend Castro.

    The UNCOMMON GOOD WILL BE THE ONLY THING WHICH CAN REVERSE THE DOWNWARD SPIRAL THE FIRST DISTRICT,THIS CITY,THIS STATE AND INDEED THE
    COUNTRY IS ON.

    Lowering the bar to common standards will be the death knell of this country.It has
    been the creation of the UNCOMMON that had made this country what it was,until it
    has been brought to its knees...but those who.."want to be fair" and reward the
    corrupt and the illegal that game the system-which now rewards failure all at
    individual,corporate and government levels.

    Here is a challenge for Mr.Garcia:

    Initiate a State Ballot Measure which will:

    l.Require the State Legislature to Pass a budget by a date certain.
    2.Establish a scale of fines to be assessed against the Legislators and Governor which
    be increased on a weekly basis until a budget is passed and signed: To WIT:

    The amount of the fine will be based upon the, then current three year average,
    of the,gross income, of the individual's total household income(from all sources).
    It will start out at the end of the first week at 10% and go up 10% each week
    thereafter until a budget is passed and signed.

    3.They will be precluded from obtaining any loans from the,or any State,Credit
    Union(now most get almost free loans to tide them over.).

    4.Their pay will,of course,be suspended.

    5.They will be precluded from getting any funds of any type;gift or loans,from
    lobbyist,corporations,or any other source.If they are caught all parties involved
    will be fined 200% of the amount and go to jail.

    Let this be the FIRST PIECE OF LEGISLATION-let him demonstrate that he is NOT
    the COMMON TYPE OF COUNCIL PERSON THAT HAS SO HOBBLED THE FIRST DISTRICT
    FOR THE PAST 30 YEARS..BUT THE RATHER THE UNCOMMON!!!!
  • paulde
    Garcia will be much the same as the Lowental's who see social services and homeless as an economic engine, as Josh Lowenthal recently wrote in "The District." Josh and Robert are friends and business associates. Robert's first vote was to afirm busing into Long Beach, homeless mental cases, including pedophiles from COUNTY WIDE LOCATINS. This cluster f^&*% of a Council needs more than another Lowenthal clone.
  • Eric
    Jeez, two days on the job and he's already being annointed as savior to all of Long Beach's problems..

    Forget the wetlands, I want to know what Garcia (and the rest of the council) plans to do to stop the nightly shootings and murders going on in our city. Crime is out of control.

    Sometimes I think LB city council members live in a bubble. That, or their priorities are seriously out of whack.
  • The Toad
    Yes, their priorities are seriously out of whack. That's not new; they have been so for well over 20 years. Almost every time we are offerred CHARTER REFORM, "we" vote it in and "we" screw ourselves in the process. Its only going to get worse until "we" wake up and return our governance and elections to the way they were in the 1970s.
  • BrettM
    Good for Garcia - putting his calendar online and voting for the wetlands documents release. Not bad for his first two days. I'm impressed, and it is about time that we elected someone from our younger generation.
  • Mike Ruehle
    Wow, Councilman Garcia. Right out of the gate you are listening to residents and taking actions to improve upon Long Beach’s entrenched old boys’ network. First, you vote to release the emails withheld by the city regarding the Public Records Act request on the dirty wetlands deal. Now you’ve opened your calendar to the public as a second step at improved government transparency. You are actually walking the talk. Integrity is a very rare commodity in our city government these days. I commend you for setting the example others only talk about. Please keep it up.

    If you review the November City Council meeting where the lobbyist ordinance was voted down, you will find that Councilman DeLong also TALKED about opening his calendar to the public just before he voted down the lobbyist ordinance. I believe “TALKED” is the operative word. Unlike Councilman Garcia, Councilman DeLong did not follow through with posting his calendar on-line for the public to see. He is one of those old guard Councilmembers who only TALKS about doing the right thing but seldom follows through.
  • janis
    You are SOOOOO easy Ruehle. Garcias is going to break your heart just like Foster & DeLong. Successful politicians create coalitions, find acceptable compromises and manage discontent.

    I just wish Foster & DeLong were more upfront about it. Voting to approve the wetlands land deal without knowing the details was outrageous. Foolish amateur hour political move. There are much better ways to railroad a project.

    I can say that Garcia is heading in the right direction pushing for more transparency in government. However, just because a politician shines sunshine on their emails and contacts, this does not mean necessarily that you are going to like their vote.
  • wrongbeachJohn
    I'll never forget that garcia comes from gordons pen...the same one that gives us city employee greet pimping for city councilman lurch, and ex port of wrong beach employee higgenbottom claiming a ridiculous premise to suck up to his old employer, while wrongly trashing the port of LA, who got it right.
    LBReport, press-telerag, chamber of commerce; three expert flim flam artists.
  • wrongbeachJohn
    OF course I mean LBPost, sorry Mr. Pearl.
  • The Toad
    You owe Bill Pearl, publisher of LB Report, a huge apology! He is anything but a flim flam artist. Could you be confusing his publication with LBPost?
  • Mike Ruehle
    Maybe you are right. However, I always start out hoping for the best for someone knew. It's only after I've been kicked in the teeth and stabbed in the back multiple times by guys like Mayor Foster and Councilman DeLong do I become disappointed. Let's hope that won't happen with Councilman Garcia.
  • Juan Pardell
    Well, so far, I'm sorry I had my doubts. I'm sure there will be many issues in which people will disagree with Robert. However, if he keeps his lines of communication open, at least the people of Long Beach will have a greater understanding as to how an issue will benefit the city.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 

© 2007-2008 Seven Days Publishing LLC.