News

SAVE IT, DON’T PAVE IT

 

Vigil for the destroyed wetlands energizes city officials, activists alike


PHOTO by RUSS ROCA

2H Construction trucks had retrieved every ounce of offending asphalt cuttings by the time Los Cerritos Wetlands Land Trust folks arrived the evening of March 27 to hold a vigil marking the one-week anniversary of the wetlands parcel’s illegal bulldozing.

But they’d also left behind a monstrous calling card: one earthmover, size large, parked just outside the gates to the sad land on the south side of Loynes Drive, just west of Studebaker Road.

“What’s up with that guy?” Land Trust Executive Director Elizabeth Lambe wondered about 2H head Sean Hitchcock, who recently purchased the parcel from developer Tom Dean and graded it March 19 and 20 without securing any city permits.

“It’s a little tone deaf to leave a bulldozer out there when we’re having a vigil,” Lambe said.

And then, just minutes before the 5 p.m. event was to start, there came a semi truck. A driver emerged, drove the behemoth onto his trailer, chained it down and departed.

“It’s so funny—they just happened to come and take it away,” said activist and photographer Diane Rush, who was happy to have documented the machine’s removal. “Too bad they couldn’t have come and taken it away last week.”

That was too bad—just as it was too bad this whole sorry incident ever happened. But the earthmover’s timely departure may also have been a harbinger of bright days to come.

To some of the more than 60 officials, conservationists and outraged residents who held signs and protested for two hours that Friday night on Loynes Drive, Hitchcock’s quick clean-up last week—following outrage expressed by some city officials—signaled the very beginnings of what could be a sea change in Long Beach.

“They want to be green without having to do a lot of work,” said Algalita Marine Research Foundation Captain Charles Moore, an avowed conservationist. “But they’re slowly changing. The talk is changing. Talking the talk is step one. We need to move to step two: walking the walk.”

Yes, the royal we, a number which on Friday included the vigil’s keynote speaker, Fourth District Councilman Patrick O’Donnell, and Eighth District Councilwoman Rae Gabelich—one of two council members who in February voted against trading the city’s public service yard to Dean for some of his extensive wetlands holdings.

Mayor Bob Foster and Third District Councilman Gary DeLong—whose turf includes the denuded wetlands—seemed conspicuous by their absence. But Friday’s turn-out—and words from the elected officials who did show up—served to buoy everyone’s spirits.

“We’re here to send a message that open space in Long Beach matters to us. I have to tell you personally that I’m humbled by this big crowd of people,” said Lambe, a relatively recent Land Trust hire, who previously helped lead the fight to keep a toll road out of San Onofre State Beach.

“I have to thank the city of Long Beach for making my first few months on the job interesting,” she said. “It’s been landswap one, landswap two, earth-scraping—it’s been challenging, but in a good way.”

“I think if you thought activism and democracy were dead in Long Beach, tonight is proof that they are not. The fish that splash and the frogs that croak in the wetlands depend on us to speak for them,” councilman O’Donnell agreed during his remarks in nearby Channel View Park, his wife and young daughters looking on and holding signs calling for wetlands restoration.

“My message is plain and simple: ‘Save Our Wetlands.’ Is that your message too?”

The crowd answered “Yes!” resoundingly.

“That’s our message and we’re not going to back off. What happened last week is a tragedy but out of it will come something good,” said O’Donnell, affirming afterwards that he fully supports having the city council re-examine the wetlands landswap in closed session April 21.

“It is our voices that will make a difference, so please do not walk away from this cause. You’ve got to know that two or three councilmembers can’t save the wetlands alone.”

And with that, protesters shouldered their signs, with slogans reading “Conservation Not Corruption,” “Justice for Wetlands”—even “The Birds,” an Alfred Hitchcock reference—and walked out to Loynes Drive.

Vehicles slowed, most drivers honking and waving their support, and even two carloads of Long Beach police seemed more concerned that protesters not shorten their own lives by standing on the traffic island than about stifling their message.

“If we were standing here at sunset you’d see all this wonderful flying,” said activist Thomas Marchese as we stood at the south railing of the Los Cerritos Channel bridge and regarded the bare wetlands dirt. “Now it’s like a killing field.”

Land Trust member Mary Suttie, whose T-shirt read “Save It/Don’t Pave It,” agreed.

“I know everybody sees oil wells and eyesores, but there’s so much wildlife,” said Suttie as a heckler honked and yelled “Pave it over!”

“I see the ground squirrels in there, I see the egrets and the herons nesting in the palm trees,” she continued. “All these things are our ecosystem.”

Why can’t we all just get along? The councilwoman had an answer for that.

“When you didn’t have the representatives willing to talk openly in February, that tells you something. I felt like it was a done deal,” Gabelich said of the council’s one-night-only public consideration of the land swap.

“The night we voted on it, [Dean representative and city lobbyist] Mike Murchison told us ‘Get this done. There’s a bigger project on the horizon.’ Because of this it’s going to make whatever that is [require] much greater transparency to the public,” Gabelich said, lending some credence to speculation that Dean engineered the sale and destruction of this land to hasten his own wetlands deal with the city.

“I think Tom [Dean] shot himself in the foot on this one,” she said.

Tags: , , , , ,

  • LBFamily
    Who needs wetlands anyway? What we really need to do is spend all the city's money to build a giant airport so Jet Blue will stick around. Maybe we can let Jet Blue dump there old Airbus planes in the wetlands when they are done with them. Better yet, have Jet Blue promise not to buy any American made planes so more aerospace business in Long Beach can go under like the Boeing 717 plant.

    Don't get me started on that waste of time and money breakwater study. Who needs waves that make a city appealing to turists?
  • Com_Mentor
    WOW, Deja Vu:
    And no big deal, no fine?
    This is how it goes? Well, Mr. Hitchcock knew there was little risk in his decision to do work without a permit.
    What a shame.


    Los Angeles Times.
    State orders project halted - A Coastal Commission report says work altering part of the Los Cerritos Wetlands in Long Beach is illegal without a permit.

    By Deborah Schoch
    July 11, 2007

    The California Coastal Commission's executive director has ordered Bixby Ranch Co. to halt a construction project that altered and filled a piece of the Los Cerritos Wetlands in Long Beach, calling the work a violation of the state Coastal Act.

    The commission staff is also investigating two other alleged violations in the sprawling salt marshes on the border between Los Angeles and Orange counties. A pond estimated at five acres has dried up on Bixby land just east of the Trader Joe's off 2nd Street, staff members said Tuesday.

    "There are allegations that they were pumping water out of the wetlands area. That is still under investigation," said Aaron McLendon, an enforcement official at the commission's headquarters in San Francisco.

    The Los Cerritos Wetlands, at the mouth of the San Gabriel River, are one of the last unprotected coastal wetlands in Southern California. Dotted with oil pumps and cattails, they are at the center of a development fight, with a Home Depot proposed on one side and a Lennar Homes condominium and retail complex on the other.

    Two state agencies are hoping to buy the land and restore it, much as the Bolsa Chica wetlands were rejuvenated in Huntington Beach. Bixby Oil and Gas Co. owns much of the land.

    The Coastal Commission staff received a report May 10 that grading and vegetation removal had occurred on several thousand square feet of wetlands along Pacific Coast Highway. The staff met with representatives of Bixby and BreitBurn Management Co. and sent them a notice June 21 stating that the Coastal Act barred such work without a permit.

    A Bixby representative disagreed and said the work -- described as a pipe repair -- would continue, according to a June 29 cease and desist order from commission Executive Director Peter M. Douglas.

    In the order, Douglas told the owner to halt all non-permit work and submit a plan by Friday on how the fill would be removed.

    Bixby Vice President Timothy J. King and BreitBurn representative Jeff Winkler did not return telephone calls Tuesday.

    Company officials have contacted the commission and hired a biological consultant, McLendon said.

    "We are very hopeful that we can work with Bixby," he said. "We hope to come up with an amicable resolution that restores the wetlands and enhances the wetlands that were disturbed."

    deborah.schoch@latimes.com
  • PT website is censored
    We just discovered that our legitimately terse comments, pointing out the City, hitchcock's and Delongs negligence ...were deleted by the Press Telegram !! What self serving spin miesters !!

    Wow, say a citical word about the Editors, the Gang of Six, the connected Old Boys Network, City Staff, Prince Gary, and it is Castro's Cuba for some censor over there. Truly weak. Telling too.

    They need to come walk around the now opened dump, and get that stench that won't wash off on them, and see all of the destruction, and pictures of all of the wildlife that lived there to understand. But we are sure, they would still cling to their apologist leanings.

    But no need, Environmental Preservation has never been their true Agenda. The Agenda appears to try, hopelessly, to play William Randolf Hearse, as to spoon feed the public what they want to hear, or have discussed.? To play intelligencia? An apologist for their mouthpieces, friends or surrogates who tow the Party Line, at all costs??

    One feels ill being censored by the PT. Thankfully the Courts, Councils and public opinion are a lot more fair.

    We still laugh at how unhinged some Editors become, when residents put flyers, contradicting the bias of their story lines, door to door . Often a simple message containing the fair and unvarnished truth , sends them spinning.

    During the Save Our Bay, Lennar, Pumpkin Patch, Home Depot battles, this would cause them to write and write, spin and spin, gripe and moan.....and ultimately lose. Consistantly.

    And the Gazzette can be absolute hogwash at times too.. Scary Salt Spewer is quite a Caveman at times...

    Grow some stones PT, be fair and balanced. Foster free and fair debate, respect Civil Liberties, Due Process and tell the town the entire story. And quit sheltering Gary DeLong, after this last boner. Politically, more and more agree, he is a dead man walkin'., mostly because he is lazy, and not cut out for the job. He is not cut from bonafide District 3 cloth.

    It will be especially interesting to see how the feign further damage control once the truth behind this Fat Cat inflating, inside dealing, buddy bailout , gift of public assets, Wetlands exchange scheme hits the big presses, and the Courts.

    Now we know why poor Joe Segura's hair turned so grey ! He works in the Soviet Embassy ! Thank goodness for Joe, he truly tries to be fair.

    Rather than the PT, call it an inappropriate, and elsewhere often unlawful, ''P rior restrain T' upon Free Speech.'.

    Who do they think that they are fooling by never having the courage or integrity to pen a single disparaging word about Gary? Ever? And then they wonder why they have trouble giving the paper away? Lost objectivity, skewed Editorial bent and failed Journalistic Integrity.

    Appalling and disheartening, but typically Long Beach.

    Thank goodness for the District and LB Report, LA Times and KTLA 5..
  • Mike Ruehle
    It is notable that neither Councilman DeLong nor Mayor foster showed up to stop the unpermitted destruction nor attended the vigil last Friday night. I hope voters remember this situation during their next election campaign 18 months from now. District 3 deserves a Councilperson willing to listen to and represent residents at least as well as the representation provided by Councilmembers from other districts, namely Councilman O’Donnell and Councilwoman Gabelich.
  • CoastalsemiPostal
    The Coastal Preservation majority will never forget the 30 years of criticism that the PT rained, mecilessly, on the Environmantal Community. For Longtime readers who know Don May and the Californis Earthcorp, or it's associates, or members, seeing them finally kind of get it is a hoot. It's like a '' how dense can you be for how long.'' issue. Ask Don, or Diane Mann and friends how much unenlightened ignorance and insensitivity the Editors piled upon them story after story, year after year.?. Some believe that this bias is because they basically want to reshape thorny old Long Beach, into Irvine or Orange County.

    So to be fair, for too long, the big shots at the PT were in the PAVE IT, call the SAVE IT crowd crazy.... camp. They whined every foot of the way as every element of the Coastal Act ushered in Progressive Development. They still fail to grasp the methods of Environmentally responsible planning and permitting. Bless Joe Segura for trying to be fair, so often. Ask him how many letters, or stories got killed along the way.

    Also, if you know these guys, John, the Editorial slant is more than mere opinion. it is too often fraught with an Agenda. Too often an attempt to frame the debate, and influence public opinion to align with theirs. Most see through it, but somewhere along the way, objectivity,balance and ethics fell away. They grasp to old Long Beach as if bringing it back will somehiow save their paper. It won't. We have grown up, and on.

    What really makes you laugh is when you hear the stories about certain Editors claiming that they are the 'most powerful' person in town. Ask Wielenga about that one. a lot of us abhore purported 'legends' in their own minds. Funny how many of them band together like Frat boys.

    We have 7 Democrats on Council, and the Mayor. You guys way on the right at the Editorial desk, are the minority, and less and less relevant. Sl Council, sans Gary, how respected you make them feel? Or relevant?

    Many are so angry with DeLong for allowing this mess to happen, for yet another 'Buddy' that they now look to the PT, as a big part of the reason that we have to tolerate this potato head.

    Why the corruption and favoritism involved with this Wetlands Exchange is not on the front page shocks some of us. Clearly, running interference for a favorite son is a big part.

    Bless the real Journalists, but the big shots get it wrong, over and over and over. If they had any integrity at all, they would have called for DeLong's sanction, repremand or censure, many times in the past. Don't hold your breath, the adore the guy, he is part of the movers and shakers club....LOL....and also a Conservative, all growth is good uber Conservative Republican, ''posing'' in his Hybrid vehicle,.

    The PT needs guys like Segura, or Wielenga, to do honest, probing investigative journalism again too. And it needs to be far more progressive, more like the LA Times, or New York Times, and less like the OC Register.

    Why they never investigated DeLong, or his inside deals,or favoritism for buddies, and more baffles us. To the PT, teflon Gary is the hope for renewal on Council to them. No likely. He is a one termer. Some solid names are perking up to unseat him

    Imagine, the LA times had to cover the local story? They had to ask the fair questions? And the PT Editors feign damage control.?

    Promote Segura, give him a big raise, rehire Wielenga at twice his last salary, and hire Pearl too, boot the stodgey old Gaurd, and we will all build an inclusive, shining, tolerant, intellectually honest, fair, unbiased, wide open, GREEN, City by the Sea.
  • wrongbeachjohn
    CoastalLawExpert said:

    "If anything needs to be cleaned up, and bulldozed, it is a few of the know it all, know little Editors at the Press Telegram !! Put Wielenga,Douglas,Pearl and Segura on the Board.....boot Gary's defenders, and benefactors, Allison and Archibald, or whomever wrote that incendiary, pass the buck drivel !"

    I have to second that; but I suspect that most intelligent readers are "on" to the degradation and growing irrelevance of the press-telegram. Everybody I speak to acknowledges that.

    Meanwhile, hats off to hitchcock et al for their minimally disruptive (could have been a lot worse) actions which have stirred up the hornets nest. Great publicity for a great cause. I'm all for contributing some soccer balls to their league in thanks.
  • CoastalLawExpert
    Can you believe the Editorial ingorance, and insensitivity in the PT Editors story today?

    Not a disparaging word about all of the wildlife crushed, nor a single accusatory word about the deriliction of duty by DeLong, his Staff or the City, who was largely complicent?

    On their watch, in their district, on their resume. DeLong and Hithcock are pals, where was that fact?


    Thier slander towards the Coastal Resources actually nesting in and around the area, absolute ignorance of Coastal Biology or Wetlands science is telling and brutally ill informed. Negligent, at best..

    Bless Joe Segura for his adept coverage, it is breathing actual Journalistic life back into his paper, great, but the Editors have their facts all scewed up once again, have done no investgation, sought no evidence, interviewed no sources, nor a single outraged expert, and opine like blind weed abatement inspectors, bent on a cover up, as a wildlife refuge, teaming with the last of many local species, was destroyed.

    Come on guys, over a 100 dens, with well worn footpathes in and out, were smashed? Nests turned under, ponds filled?

    And opening a toxic dump, to rain contaminated dust on a neighborhood, into the ocean and on OTHER wetlands, is deemed not worth a mention? Nor the fertilizer smells all about now?

    Thank you DW, and Long Beach Report, for exposong the truth, the residents concerns, the law and the facts.

    The Editorial slant of the PT Editorial this morning repeated their ' Highly Degraded Swamp ''mantra...makes a few of us want to sue them too, maybe just to make a point or two.

    If anything needs to be cleaned up, and bulldozed, it is a few of the know it all, know little Editors at the Press Telegram !!

    Put Wielenga,Douglas,Pearl and Segura on the Board.....boot Gary's defenders, and benefactors, Allison and Archibald, or whomever wrote that incendiary, pass the buck drivel !
  • An editorial is an opinion piece, plain and simple. Opinion presented as an editorial might be based upon facts or it might not but it’s never wise to seek hard-line reporting in an editorial, that’s just not its purpose. Take exception, as I did, with the opinion and how it was presented, but not with its lack of facts.

    Had I authored that PT editorial today I probably would have led with one of the final paragraphs rather than placing it at the end of the editorial, almost as an afterthought.

    “…these marshlands”… “have the potential to be restored into gorgeous wetlands, directly on the flyway of migrant fowl, and breeding grounds for other wildlife, including salt-water creatures. All but a tiny portion of California's wetlands have been lost to development, and what's left is precious not just to environmentalists but to the life systems they support.”

    I believe it’s that information that should set the tone for the story and, thus, for an editorial about the story. But then, that’s just one of the many reasons I’m not on the PT editorial staff.
  • HighHat
    Councilman Gary DeLong
    Hearing that siren's song
    Trading Wetlands for cash
    In an action so rash
    The 3rd disrict will now say "SO LONG!"
  • Janis Populi
    There once was a rich man named DEAN
    Who was talked about more than was seen
    With politicians in hand
    Lined up to give him land
    A dirty deal painted in GREEN
  • Coastal Concerns
    Apparently the LA Times received a huge volume of mail voicing outrage about this. Most felt that a wider investigation was warranted because there are too many connections to this Buddy Bailout ''Wetlands for City Peoperty'' exchange and this and other suspicious events recently.

    Civic Leaders from adjacent areas, tell other Civic Leaders stories like, '' I can't believe that the Councilman by the Wetlands is trying to pass off a deal to give his buddy the Oil Rights for free, plus, a huge profit.

    This Environmental disaster, will stand in local history, as another example of croanieism gone wild. This horrible event is clear proof of an abject, wanton and reckless failure to act by the Councilman,or Staff. Evidence of meetings with the Councilman's known good friends, Dean and Hitchcock abound. \

    Actual involvement by City Staff donating the material creates a palpable apearance of impropriey. City Staff looking the other way as it happened was negligent. Failing to stop the work when asked to show the permit was illegal. Ignoring lawful demands by many forced to witness this, to cease development and landfill of a Wetlands, and more, spelled complicity, and wider culpability. Things like this bever happen without Notice to the Councilman. Never.

    People were appalled that the Councilman, at Council the night these facts were evaluated, merely asked for a 'letter' to prevent this in the future. A letter Gary? How about your letter? Of resignation ?

    The adjacent Neighborhood Associations all have Websites, and their advocates are well known. A simple Email could have imparted Legal Notice here, or a few letters would have sufficed. None ever arrived. Many sense retribution. Fine, we'll see who rats who out when the Lawsuits come forward.

    This is the forth such event in the area in about 3 months, and the Department of Toxic Substances, AQMD and others, including Law Enforcement, are aware of this pattern, and several are studying it. The City has repeatedly failed to enforce it's own permitting and planning rules ,and ignored it's own codes, again and again under DeLong. Toxic soil has been unlawfully removed, without permit one, many times in this area too.

    . Clearly, Gary does not care, and certain Staff tend to look the other way for Dean and friends, however, this does not preveny filing Civil charges for several years. Every event, is a count on a Pleading.

    A consensus is emerging that this area is in great need of a new Councilperson, not one who's staff said to many, as they called to stop this for 2 days, that he was too busy, and 'In meetings'.

    Gary is not a people person, he is not used to the needs of a such a special district. He seems trained to be a CEO, in a small company, dealing with a few underlings, and associates at meetings. He has never been up to this job, has the worst Council Attendance record anyone can recall, and is known to complain and complain about having to listen to the people who has matters before Council. Recently, he actually had his colleagues really snickering, he actually was trying to float the idea of getting a 'Pass' to be able to miss even more meetings?

    Many hope that this horrible event, puts a period on his career in this area. This guy is wrong for this area and not up to it's residents actual needs. Hope we have a new rep soon.
  • PatBryant
    You say Councilman DeLong has the worst Council attendance record - has he missed any Council meetings this year (or last)? If so, please state which dates as I can't remember him missing any . . . or is this more of your efforts to throw mud and see what sticks since you obviously don't like the guy?
blog comments powered by Disqus
 

© 2007-2008 Seven Days Publishing LLC.