Writing Shotgun

NO, REALLY–WHY DID TOM DEAN SELL THOSE WETLANDS TO SEAN HITCHCOCK?

 

There’s another possibility, and it’s all business

You’ve all heard the explanations why 2H Construction’s Sean Hitchcock ponied up an as-yet unspecified amount of dough in February to buy 8.38 acres of wetlands at Loynes Drive and Studebaker Road: he wanted to build us a soccer field, and so forth.

But why did developer and puppetmaster Tom Dean sell it to him in the first place? Way back on March 21–the day after 2H workers illegally graded the parcel–we surmised Dean might have sold it as a way of lighting a fire under his still-pending land swap with the city.

There is, however, another possibility: what if he sold the property to Hitchcock to prove its worth?

That makes sense too–selling this eight-acre swath of wetlands, and then using it as some sort of a methane-infused benchmark, against which all his remaining wetlands area might be valued during future real estate transactions.

“I haven’t really heard anything like that, but it does make sense in a commercial market like we’re in,” says Jack Kyser, a founding economist at Kyser Center for Economic Research in Los Angeles. “They’re not lending money out there. It may be a way to establish a value.”

This scenario also makes sense when you consider the land’s provenance, and its last recorded value: $336,402 on June 29, 2005, per the good folks at the Registrar-Recorder’s Office.

Until some time last year, townhouses and double-wides were still fetching that kind of money. You can bet Dean’s 8.38-acre parcel fetched him a few million dollars, and a newly-updated comp–which is just real estate talk for “comparison price.”

Of course, not everyone is so sure he’d do such a thing–even though much of the former Bixby lands haven’t been appraised in modern times.

“You mean like a comp thing? I don’t know,” says Mike Sidney, who works for commercial real estate magnate Cushman & Wakefield in Long Beach–and was actually one of the people who represented the Bixby Ranch Company when it sold the piece of land to Dean three and a half years ago.

“Honestly, I don’t remember if they did appraisals,” Sidney says. “We marketed it and showed it to everyone under the sun. It doesn’t matter what the appraisal says if nobody will buy it. We marketed it on and off for a couple years.”

That comment should strike you as interesting too: the land was on and off the market for a couple years in a boom market, until Dean finally stepped up–and then here we are in the worst recession since World War II, and Dean just magically manages to sell it again. What a coup. apparently.

“It wasn’t actually on the market,” says Cushman & Wakefield’s Stuart Milligan, who works in Los Angeles and headed the team that represented Bixby Ranch Company back in 2005. “Tom Dean always let us know that he’d be interested in buying that property and it came to the point where Bixby Ranch Company trustees decided they’d entertain a offer.”

And Tom Dean bought himself a pig in a poke? That doesn’t sound like something he’d do.

“Well no, I mean, I he bought the mineral rights. We knew what he could do with it. The price of oil went throught he roof and he was the beneficiary of a rich revenue stream based on that,” Milligan says. “It was an 80-year-old oil field. and with new oil extraction methods and with his ability to employ state-of-the-art methods to enhance the revenue stream … .”

You can finish that sentence yourself, but just in case:

“I know he’s a very savvy, successful businessman and he probably made a deal that he thought was in his best interests. And I guess the buyer felt it was a good purchase,” Milligan says of Dean’s sale to Hitchcock.

Guess so. After all, if you read the sale documents, you see one thing plainly: Dean may have sold those 8.38 acres to Sean Hitchcock, but he held onto the mineral rights–and so, every month or every quarter, or maybe just once or twice a year, he still gets a tidy check from some oil company somewhere. Even in this economy.

That’s on top of whatever Hitchcock paid for the land, and it’s also on top of whatever Dean will make from the remaining wetlands he owns–now that he’s armed with a bona fide, recent comparison price. Wow.

It may not be easy being green–but it sounds pretty easy being Dean.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  • Dave in Alamitos Beach
    Well it's rare that I'll quote myself, but this is what I wrote last week:

    "So, if I've got this figured out correctly, Dean sold this to Hitchcock for an inflated price north of 2.3 million, and now Hitchcock is being "humble" and willing to sell it to the "wetlands people" for 2.3+ even though it's probably worth less than that? Sounds like a sweet little money making deal to me."

    At that time it sounded like Hitchcock wanted to make some money from the city, probably with a kickback to Dean. Only the City loses under that scenario. But I can see what you propose here as well. Dean & Hitchcock still win, AND Dean gets to puff up the value of all his other (more or less worthless) land.
  • Laurence Goodhue
    It is difficult to imagine anything that would cut off the flow of any Federal or State funds
    that would ordinarily flow to a City-FASTER than were a City,or any of its enterprises ,lend
    its name or participate in a PIMPING AND PUFFING SCHEME LIKE that being suggested
    above.

    It is essentially no different than than that which is a the bottom of the mortgage crises .
    But just to make sure-will ask the United States District Attorney in Los Angeles.
  • Pat
    mark-to-market accounting hard at work! This exact scheme is what happens throughout Southern California at any vacant lot, waiting to be exploited by a developer. It just happens that this particular lot was allowed to go back to nature 80 years ago. What about the empty strawberry fields throughout Orange County or empty warehouses up and down the 710 waiting to be redeveloped?

    The value of any piece of property shouldn't be what someone will pay for it but what its utility will be for the community.
  • Coastal BS Meter
    We have witnesses who were there trying to buy this land to hold it for Wetlands use. And Stewart is a bombastic, lying asshole who has plenty of enemies. What a liar that guy is...this lot sold for less than a Million bucks if we remember.

    This Brackish Pond Lot, and the 2 other bare lots, just East, went to Dean at the same time. This bughole Stuart, refused higher offers from Preservationists, stating...we will sell it to Dean for less, because he is willing to try to do development on it...''

    Then , they funded DeLong, he got in, and he held a STARCHAMBER, to try to add development rights to the area. This is basically why Big Money funded him.

    During the secret committee, by DoRong, only Tom Dean was invited to speak as a Developer. Our Witness heard him whine, and snivel, and gripe, like a petulant baby, that '' I bought those three Wetlands lots, to donate them to the Wetlands, if they let me build my Home Depot''.

    He was trying to use the land as Mitigation. Problem is, you can't trade Wetlands off site, for the required 30% SEADIP Open Space requirement, ON sight.

    Then, Dean bought the unbuildable Easement Corridor, just North of Kettering Elementary, and South of 7th Street, the old CSULB overflow parking lot, and tried to keep more density on the Home Depot site, by off sight mmitigation there. A little greenbelt.

    Of course nobody asked the residents, who file a memo in Opposition which was added to the successful Lawsuit.

    Time for the facts here. Time for the Coastal BS Meter.


    people around the original Bixby sale
  • LBC007
    I thought Bixby Bellflower Oil Prospect, LLC owns the mineral rights to that parcel?? i guess the question is: who owns Bixby Bellflower Oil Prospect, LLC
  • Jena
    Tom Dean and his partner Mike Nunley are dirty rotten business men and cheat on their wives. Mike Nunley! It's time to grow up and stop running to Tom like he's your daddy. And Tom, butt out & mind your own business and stay out of Mike's 4th divorce. Pay attention to your own marriage, then maybe people wouldn't see your wife with other men. Warning...if you do business with Tom Dean, you sell your soul to the devil and guaranteed you will get screwed over! And Mike Nunley, quit riding on Tom Dean's shirt tails of money. Quit trying to be Tom Dean Jr. You wouldn't have that house or the nice cars if it weren't for Tom's $$$. You're a grandfather for God's sake, start acting like it. You need serious help.
  • Coastal Restorationists
    Powerful post. Tell us more because your pain is our pain. You need to call David Wielenga and chat with him. He will keep any secrets because he is an Ethical man. His word is good.

    He is an honest, good man, as are many of us. Trust that if you help us, we will help you continue to teach these boys a lesson or two.

    Please, call Dave or Theo. They have excellent Lawyers in the loop, and lots of friends.

    We are very sorry that these rotten scoundrels may have harmed you too. Many of us detest men who abuse women, and relish the opportunity to help them learn a lesson ot two, and some manners
  • wrongbeachJohn
    The whole wetlands "business" situation oozes with sleaze and sleazy people.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 

© 2007-2008 Seven Days Publishing LLC.