Writing Shotgun

GARCIA’S EBO: WHAT PART OF ‘EQUAL’ DON’T PEOPLE UNDERSTAND?

 

First District councilmember Robert Garcia and staff have worked for almost two months on the Equal Benefits Ordinance he proposed this morning, and it took less than two minutes for people to begin misunderstanding it.

The Equal Benefits Ordinance (EBO), which Garcia has placed on the July 14 council agenda, would require most companies doing business with the City of Long Beach to offer the same spousal benefits packages to all employees, straight or gay. If the spouse of a married employee receives benefits, then the legally registered domestic partner of a gay employee must receive benefits, too. That’s it.

The Press-Telegram was the first to post a story on the EBO—based on Garcia’s press release—this morning, and its readers began convoluting and misinterpreting this simple proposal almost immediately. Confused and angry, people started calling his office, too.

“People seem to think that the Equal Benefits Ordinance will force companies to hire more gay employees or to begin offering spousal benefits … or something,” Garcia said, calling the District Weekly to clarify an earlier conversation after the shit started hitting the fan. “The ordinance would simply close a loophole.”

City staff has indicated that the loophole can be closed without significant expense, too, says Garcia.

“The change would boil down to one more question that applicants must answer on the regular Request for Proposal process that the city already has in place for contracts,” he says. “And compliance would be determined as part of the same audits that are already in place.”

The ordinance would allow for some exceptions to be made by the city manager, such as in cases of public emergency, small contracts and vendors and other similar circumstances.  The ordinance would also not apply to businesses that do not offer spousal benefits. The ordinance only applies to businesses that do business with the city.

Garcia heralds the EBO as “historic,” but that’s only true as far as Long Beach history is concerned. The councilmember’s own press release acknowledges that “the state of California has an EBO in place, as do other large cities including Los Angeles, Oakland, Seattle, San Francisco, Portland and Minneapolis.”

In some ways, that makes the proposal even more important.

“We are thrilled that Councilmember Garcia has proposed this historic ordinance,” said Kimberly Woods, Executive Director of the LGBT Center in Long Beach, in Garcia’s press release.  “The LGBT community is united in supporting this important measure.”

“Long Beach is an internationally recognized leader in equal rights for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community,” said Second District councilmember Suja Lowenthal—who is co-sponsoring the proposal—in Garcia’s press release. “We need to show leadership when it comes to equality for all.”

Historic or not, Randy Gordon, CEO of the Long Beach Area Chamber of Commerce, wasn’t quite as excited about the Equal Benefits Ordinance. He issued a press release that kind of hemmed and hawed and then announced that he didn’t have an opinion, either way. Here’s how Gordon put it.

“The Chamber supports Councilmember Robert Garcia’s aggressive action relative to his beliefs so early in his term. However, we understand that an EBO is a trend in many cities with wide support and also has the needed support of Long Beach City Council to pass. The Chamber likewise understands that business is simply unable to sustain increased governmental expense requirements in the current recessionary environment. Therefore, the Chamber will remain neutral and will not take a position on Councilmember Garcia’s Equal Benefits Ordinance.”

For more information on the proposal, including the facts of the plan and to find out what other cities are doing, log on to: www.robertgarcia.com.

  • Fern
    California already requires employers to offer the same benefits to gay employees and their dependents that the employer offers to straight employees/dependents. I don't get what this measure does that will change anything? I work in HR for an employer who has several gay employees and we offer the exact same benefits package to their spouses/registered domestic partners that we offer to our straight employee's spouses. We would do it anyway, but we're required by law to provide those benefits.
  • Laurence B. Goodhue
    Like many measures launched by elected novices(at any level) the item though well intended,is ill advised and certainly ill timed.

    It will be interesting to see if the maker of the motion and those that would
    support it,will do more than pay lip service to the concept.

    Will they tell China Long Beach will no longer do business with them or
    any manufacture whose products are made in China unless the knuckle under
    to the concept so at war with China's deep rooted doctrine.

    Will they tell the middle east countries whose oil powers the cars the maker
    of the motion and its supporters drive they will longer be able ship their
    oil through Long Beach? Have they checked to see where their bikes are
    made?.OOOPS THEIR GOES PORT FUNDING FOR BREAKWATER STUDIES AND
    OTHER RELATED MATTER!!!

    Perhaps the maker of the motion has not checked to see if the hair dryer he
    uses-is made in China.

    What happens if the best bid Long Beach receives is from a company that
    does not knuckle under-do we suffer the consequences of an inferior bid???

    Clearly the measure approaches the level of a fool's errand.
  • The Toad
    Re: "What part of equal don't people understand?". I'll tell you what part of "equal" I don't understand: Why should this proposed piece of legislation be exempt from the usual committee hearings that any other proposal would be subjected to? I would be willing to let the Council decide just which committee(s) should hold hearings to evaluate all aspects/impacts of this propoal, but I would expect the Budget Oversight Committee's involvement as a minimum. Can anyone honestly say that this proposal will not cause the price the city pays to it's contractors to increase? And in economic times like we are experiencing? If you want "equal", then act equal!
  • rdm24
    I can't imagine any of the arguments about "tough economic times" would disappear if we had a budget surplus. It sounds like a last-gasp argument from the desparate proponents of bigotry.
  • The Toad
    So now, expecting that any piece of proposed legislation with city-wide impacts should go through the usual process of council committee hearings is bigotry. What bullshit!
  • rino2
    My apology to Daniel Brezenof. I have heard that different employee unions helped to fund his campaign and so I thought as a usual politician he would be fighting tooth and nail to protect the employee unions above all else. But, if he has supported furloughs since day one, I am wrong. How about a starbucks gift card as payment?
  • Todd
    I'm so sick of comments like the ones posted by lbresident. Garcia has only been in office for 2 months. CHILL. You have this opinion that Garcia is just sitting around putting together parades, latinos, and gay rights. Like Daniel said your really not aware of all that Garcia has been up to. I applaud Garcia for all his hard work so far and I am very excited to see what's next for him. Chill lbresident!
  • daniel brezenoff
    Please visit robertgarcia.com for more information about the Equal Benefits Ordinance.

    Thanks!
  • Esteemed Daniel B: I visited robertgarcia.com and read all of the factual information on the proposed EBO that is offered there. One thing remains unclear to me, however and I readily admit that I may have missed this:

    Would the EBO be applicable only to qualifying companies seeking new contracts with the City, or would it be applied, ex post facto, to all qualifying companies with current contracts as well?

    Thanks in advance for any clarification you, or another, can offer on this!
  • daniel brezenoff
    The EBO would affect new contracts and renewals. So current contractors would have until contract renewal to get an EB program in place.

    It's also possible the City Manager and purchasing could work with companies to give them reasonable time to enact an EB program, for example, if they had to wait for contract renewal with their health benefits providers.

    Hope that helps, Brother John.

    d
  • Most helpful, Mr. B. Thanks!
  • Pat
    I hope this passes.

    I also hope Pat West doesn't start handing out special dispensation to companies that do not comply.

    Furthermore, I hope companies with city contracts do not drop spousal benefits altogether in order to work around the EBO (for "moral" reasons or otherwise). If a company does, they should be dropped off the city payroll.
  • daniel brezenoff
    >>>I hope companies with city contracts do not drop spousal benefits altogether in order to work around the EBO

    In other cities with EBO's, this has not occurred. I'd invite you to come share this important concern at Tuesday's meeting if you are able.
  • lbresident
    What I find most interesting is that Robert campaigned on clean beaches, litter removal, better infrastructure, and better fiscal management.

    Since he's been in office he's focussed on parades for latinos and gay rights.

    Not necessarily bad things but certainly not top priorities considering his campaign promises and the current $40+ million budget deficit.

    Bait and switch...
  • daniel brezenoff
    I don't think that's quite fair; the Latino parade and EBO were both introduced in the last week; over the previous 7 weeks, our office has put a great deal of time, energy, and political capital into revitalizing pacific ave and pine ave, supporting the police department, addressing parking issues, and a host of other projects, which are ongoing, and which do address the concerns you've listed, as well as others the Councilmember campaigned on, including public safety and quality of life. Councilmember Garcia has been in office two months; many of these issues are going to take some time, but if you read this publication, the Post, the Gazettes and/or the P-T, it is clear that there has been a lot more going on than "latino parades and gay rights" (worthy projects themselves). As far as fiscal management - budget sessions are often closed to the public, so you may not be aware of everything going on, but that doesn't mean Councilmember Garcia is doing nothing; he's in every budget hearing, and has spent a great deal of time getting up to speed, and advocating for any reasonable budget-cutting measure proposed, while keeping his office budget low. And the projects he's proposed have been cost neutral or very inexpensive.

    I hope this clears things up a bit.
  • Gerrie Schipske
    Daniel -- budget sessions are not closed to the public. That would be a violation of the Brown Act. I am certain your boss knows that.
  • lbresident
    Where does robert stand on this:

    Currently, the total contribution for a miscellaneous employee making $100K a year is 20% of his/her payroll or $20,000/yr., of which the employee contributes $2,000 and the taxpayers contribute $18,000. For public safety employees making $100K a year, the total contribution is 25% of his/her payroll or $25,000/yr., of which the employee contributes $2,500/yr., and the taxpayers contribute $22,500/yr. Pensions now account for $80Million of the General Fund and will continue to compound yearly. These figures were for 2008; we don't know what they are for 2009 or will be for 2010. We only know they will be much higher.

    Pension costs are the reason Long Beach continues to have a Structural Deficit. It took Scharzenegger too long to confront the issue with the California Legislature; we can only hope some common sense will jump start a discussion on pension reform in Long Beach.

    Governor Scharzenegger threatens to hold back signature on any new legislation until the structural deficit is fixed in California, and that means reform, including pensions. If Mayor Foster is truly honest about his statement in his interview with Art Levine, telling Mr. Levine that the employees know the pensions are not sustainable; what is holding the Mayor back in doing anything meaningful to fix Long Beach's structural deficit by reforming pensions?
  • Fisch
    lbresident: just curious as to where you're getting these contribution figures- last I was aware, an employee making $100k a year had a total annual contribution of $8,000 to PERS. Of that $8,000, the employee contributes $2,000 and taxpayers picked up the remaining $6,000. Has this changed?

    That said, While I'm supportive of Robert's ordinance, I think that ALL councilmembers should be concentrating, first and foremost, on fixing LB's budget mess, crime, sidewalks, etc.
  • rino2
    I don't know much about Daniel Garcia and have not heard him speak, but on your comment about him "advocating for any reasonable budget-cutting measure proposed", I'll bet you 3 to 1 he hasn't advocated, and probably thinks unreasonable, gov't employee furloughs to cut the budget.
  • daniel brezenoff
    Not sure if I'm understanding you correctly, but just in case:

    The Councilmember's name ir Robert Garcia.

    I am Daniel Brezenoff, his legislative director.

    Thanks,

    d
  • daniel brezenoff
    Councilmember Garcia to my knowledge supported furloughs from day one. We are all furloughed the last Friday of every month, and more furloughs may yet come if you believe what you read in the papers.

    We're all for sharing the pain.

    I think you owe me three donuts.

    :-)
  • lbresident
    thank you for the response. However, I have heard nothing on the following from Robert:

    Prioritizing funds for catch basins along the LA River and throughout the city in the coming budget

    Prioritizing funds for fixing more streets and sidewalks in the coming budget

    Commenting on the need to reform employee pensions so they are defined benefit not defined contribution and so that employees contribute more to their pensions

    Prioritizing funds for litter removal along our beaches and main corridors throughout the city

    Sorry, but I get his press releases / read the papers and I've seen one on a parade and now this gay rights issue. I appreciate the work he is doing for Pacific Ave which is longer term but the above topics are all issues he can comment on and act on right now.

    If he has and I missed it, please send the link.
  • lbresident
    That's what I thought. Hopefully we'll see better focus from Robert going forward. All politicians have their pet projects so I don't hold this against him but we need to see him deliver on the key city issues as well.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 

© 2007-2008 Seven Days Publishing LLC.