Writing Shotgun

DID FOSTER’S ‘SOURCES’ SCUTTLE SMITH’S REAPPOINTMENT?

 

A spokesperson for Mayor Bob Foster does not deny that Long Beach’s chief executive may have declined to reappoint Jack C. Smith to the Housing Development board because of Foster’s suspicion that Smith made negative comments about the mayor’s relationship with well-connected developer Tom Dean. The story was reported first on LBReport.com

In a wide-ranging e-mail sent this morning at 11:32 a.m.—a request for a telephone interview with Foster was denied—spokesperson Stacey Ann Fong Toda acknowledged that Foster confronted Smith about the alleged comments when the two met in Foster’s office last week.

“The Mayor point blank asked Mr. Smith about statements that he allegedly made that were directed towards the Mayor during a recent community meeting—which Mr. Smith denied making and assured the Mayor anytime he had a disagreement he would call the Mayor or his staff directly,” wrote Toda.

But Toda’s e-mail brought up several other subjects, including the fact that Smith had expressed an interest in being appointed to the Parks and Recreation Department board, and that seventh district city council member Tonia Reyes Uranga had personally endorsed Smith for that post.

“It would be a bit odd to put forward the re-appointment for Mr. Smith if he, with what seemed to be the strong support of his councilperson, wanted to be appointed to a different commission,” Toda wrote.

Contacted by telephone this morning, Smith denied making any negative comments about Foster’s relationship with Dean.  Smith said he was caught off guard when Foster accused him of making the comments after summoning him to city hall last week.

“I was floored,” Smith said. “I have no recollection of saying anything about that. I told the mayor that I do not have any knowledge that he even knows Tom Dean.”

Dean’s financial contributions to Foster’s campaign and a subsequent series of sweetheart land deals with the City of Long Beach—most notably, a complicated swap of city property for land near the Los Cerritos Wetlands that public documents indicate was closely monitored by Foster—have been the subject of several investigative articles in The District Weekly.

Smith said that Foster apparently did not believe his denials.

“He told me that he has two sources that are reliable,” Smith said. “I said they are not telling the truth.”

Smith said he then told Foster—who appointed him to the Housing Development Company in 2007—that he’d noticed that his name was not on the list to be re-appointed.

“He told me, ‘That’s correct,’” said Smith.

“I asked, ‘Why?’

“He said, ‘Because of this.’”

Smith emphasized that he knows Foster is within his rights to appoint whoever he wants to the Housing Development board as well as many other posts.

“But I’m disappointed that he seems to be taking rumor and innuendo as fact over having a personal conversation with me to clear it up,” Smith said. “I’m also amazed he cares so much about what I have to say, one way or another. He is the mayor. I’m just this community activist.”

For now, anyway. When asked, Smith acknowledged that he is considering a run for the seventh district city council seat that Reyes Uranga will be vacating next year because of term limits. Smith said he informed Foster of his possible candidacy during their meeting.

Meanwhile, whatever opinions Smith may or may not hold regarding the Foster-Dean connection and whether or not he expressed them would seem to have little bearing on his work with the Long Beach Housing Development Company.

According to the organization’s website, (www.LBHDC.org) its mission is “to provide safe and livable neighborhoods in Long Beach by promoting, developing, and preserving decent, safe and affordable housing for the very low-, low- and moderate-income residents of Long Beach.”

It was “established by the City of Long Beach on July 25, 1989. The LBHDC is a California non-profit public benefit corporation governed by a board comprised of 14 members appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council. The Board sets policy and provides direction to Housing Services staff in acquiring, rehabilitating, sponsoring, and constructing affordable housing. The City Council approves the LBHDC’s bylaws and changes thereto, and the City provides all staff and administrative support, including most of the LBHDC’s annual funding.”

Smith would appear to be well qualified for the job. He works as a line producer for Hollywood productions—that is, projecting and managing the budgets of movies and television shows—and in 1995 received an Academy Award for developing computer software that revolutionized the industry’s financial projection, management and accountability.

Come to think of it, such skills might come in handy on the Long Beach City Council, too.

“I’m not looking for a fight. I don’t want this to become some big brouhaha,” Smith said. “I respect the mayor and I hope we can work together down the road to make Long Beach better.”

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  • Mike Ruehle
    Tonight, I again spoke before City Council about Parking Commission Chairman Kurt Schneiter’s low level of professionalism and also entered into the record my complaint of his conflict of interest. Commissioner Schneiter is using his Mayoral appointed position to improve his personal business interests by trying to shove valet parking for his Bono’s restaurant down the throats of Belmont Shore residents for the fourth time.

    I informed Council that Commissioner Schneiter had failed to disclose all of his 2nd street financial interests on his California Form 700 as required by state law under criminal penalty. Commissioner Schneiter’s form 700 failed to disclose 3 of his 5 2nd street real property holdings near where he plans to implement the valet parking at Bono’s. Furthermore, Commissioner Schneiter did not declare on the 700 form his ownership of his alcohol license for Bono’s restaurant per the below link.

    http://www.abc.ca.gov/datport/LQSdata.asp?ID=20...

    Moreover, Parking Commissioner Schneiter was SUPPOSEDLY told by City Attorney Shannon’s office to refrain from attempting to influence residents to support his valet parking. Meanwhile, emails indicate Commissioner Schneiter has ignored the City Attorney’s instruction and he continues to do so.

    There were numerous residents who testified last year against Mayor Foster's appointment of Mr. Schneiter’s appointment to the Parking Commission. Mayor Foster and Councilman DeLong ignored our concerns. Now, Mayor Foster has failed to remove a Commissioner who has blatantly ignored conflict of interest and disclosure laws. Yet just last week, Mayor Foster removed Jack Smith because he ALLEGEDLY (Jack Smith denies it) said something about Mayor Foster’s relationship with developer Tom Dean.
  • wrongbeachJohn
    I voted for blob, and what did I get:
    Trashing of righteous community activists,
    A phony measure consisting of totally discretionary funds (trust me),
    A phony land swap-deal that is a give-away to one of his money men,
    A free "loan" to those who don't need it, and
    Feeling like I've been conned (only because I was).
    F U blob!
  • The Toad
    And he's got us by the "short hairs" and he ain't gonna let go. OUCH!
  • Lisa
    It must be frustrating to have anonymous acusers. I certainly hope that it is not someone who is contemplating running for the 7th District seat or other political ambitions.
    The fact that such a comment would anger the mayor may suggest some truth to it all. Ultimately, all of this has nothing to do with Jack Smith's performance at LBHDC.
    I feel that this issue is beneath the mayor to address
  • The Toad
    Lisa-- If you are at all familiar with the "sweetheart lease deal", then you know that there is high likelihood of there being some truth to "the comment". The membership of the West Long Beach Association is very concerned about, and critical of, said lease deal. "The comment" is basically popular with the Association (members) and would have been politically expedient to have been made by a potential 7th District candidate, the louder the better. That is, If "the comment" was made.
  • The Toad
    Dave Wielenga--This is request for some investigative reporting from you; you are the master of that discipline. I hope what follows will provide a decent lead for you to follow.
    Over the weekend, I ran into a member of the West Long Beach Association. I was told that, at a recent meeting of the Association, a certain someone made some extremely damning remarks about the nature of the relationship between a certain elected official and the recipient of a "sweetheart deal" on a lease of city-owned property near the Terminal Island Freeway (SR47). It was further stated to me that said comments were made in a very vociferous manner; everybody in the room allegedly heard them.
    Personally, I can see this story branching in several (at least 3) directions. I hope this helps and that you can find the time to pursue this further. Thanks.
  • Mike Ruehle
    Thank you Councilwoman Schipske for for calling attention to the Press Telegram's smear campaign. It's getting scary when our government leaders feel they can utilize their political influence to attempt to intimidate and subdue the public's right to free speech. Thank you again.
  • Mr. Ruehle: PT Staff Writer John Canalis didn't reveal how this information came to his or the PT's attention or why they chose to publish it now. Again you have inferred in your comments that government leaders had something to do with this news story and again I ask you: Are you able to provide us with any proof of this?
  • Mike Ruehle
    If a tree falls in the forest, can you prove it made a sound if no person was there to hear it? Can you logically argue it POSSIBLE no sound was made because there is no proof?

    Your agenda is obvious. Your hypocrisy and self interests have previously been established Police Officer Greet. Please feel free to no longer respond to me like you have stated to so many others who are now so much happier.
  • wrongbeachJohn
    Mike Ruehle 11 hours ago
    "Your agenda is obvious. Your hypocrisy and self interests have previously been established Police Officer Greet. Please feel free to no longer respond to me like you have stated to so many others who are now so much happier".

    Cabana boy greet please add me to the ignore list-thank you a thousand times in advance.
  • A simple: "No, Mr. Greet, Mr. Ruehle does not appear to have any proof to support his allegations in this area" would have sufficed.
  • Mr. Ruehle: There's no need for sarcasm or insult. A simple: "No, Mr. Greet, I have no proof to support my allegations in this area" would have sufficed.

    Perhaps it is as you allege, and the Mayor and Councilman DeLong have, in fact, somehow conspired with the Press Telegram for the sole and specific purpose of smearing you because you are routinely critical of them. This is, in fact, possible.

    But I do not find it probable. Nor, do I believe, will any intellectually honest and fair-minded person, absent some sort of proof. This was why I asked if you had any.

    I'm on record, earlier in these comments, as having said that: "...your arrest and conviction for this offense will or should not detract from your efforts to combat a significant problem -- public drunkenness and what you describe as a deteriorating quality of life in the Shore. I fully agree. This report (of your status on summary probation for drunk driving) is only marginally interesting in the grand scheme of things and shouldn't serve to distract anyone from your, or anyone else's, continued efforts in your neighborhood."

    Now, if by accusing me of having an "obvious agenda" you mean my making it a point to defend you on this issue, I suppose I must stand guilty as charged.
  • The Toad
    I, for one, believe it absolutely probable that certain parties "conspired" to smear Mr. Ruehle.
    How about a "show of hands" indicating how the rest of the usual commenters feel about it.
    Count my vote as siding with Mike!
  • howardx
    it would be ridiculous to think otherwise. certain parties threaten to withhold ad revenue from the P-T (they have a history of doing just that as we know) and boom! years old dui becomes relevant current news again.
  • howardx: I get that you and others feel this smear conspiracy theory to be probable. But unless and until proof is provided, all it is, at the end of the day, is a baseless and unfounded allegation.

    One must also ask, how is Mr. Ruehle harmed by this report? I would submit that he is not. If anything, in our current culture, an arrest record only serves to enhance his status in the community. I hope you would agree that sometimes the best spokespeople for certain causes are those who once experienced challenges in their own lives related to them.

    If this is true, then the release of this story has only served to enhance Mr. Ruehle's credibility, not to degrade it and to solidify his support base (as it clearly has here) rather than erode it.

    If anyone did conspire against Mr. Ruehle to smear him in this manner, then they very obviously miscalculated. And this, to my mind is a good thing, because engaging in such deplorable tactics is wrong, whomever sinks to doing so.

    Now if only there were *proof*…so those being thus accused could more appropriately suffer in the Court of Public Opinion and by their own hands no less!
  • The Toad
    Fairness cuts both ways. Here's great suggestion for Greet: Why don't you research the "old records" of all our currently sitting elected officials then post the results here or on your own blog. Surely you have access to those "old records". Their "old records" should be no less newsworthy than Mike Ruehle's "old record". Maybe they wiil pin a merit badge on you for enhancing their status in the community.
  • Toad: You'll note that I wasn't the one to offer Mr. Ruehle's "old records" for consideration, either here *or* in my column (though I did briefly allude to it in response to one reader's comment). PT Reporter Eakins published that information and Mr. Ruehle, himself, chose to make it a topic of conversation on this site.

    Your suggestion of providing equal time or treatment to others might be better offered to either Mr. Eakins or Mr. Ruehle don't you think?

    If I didn't find Mr. Ruehle's old records to be particularly pertinent to this discussion, why would I feel differently about the old records of anyone else we're discussing?

    As you say, Toad, "fairness cuts both ways".
  • The Toad
    No merit badge for you!
  • Dangit...
  • howardx
    yes thank you greet, now run along and tell councilman delong what youve learned today, i believe you'll find him commenting in your LBpost column! of all the places that rascal could be! what a coincidence!
  • A simple: "No, Mr. Greet, Mr. Ruehle does not appear to have any proof to support his allegations in this area" would have sufficed.
  • howardx
    how about a simple "no one will ever tell you anything regarding any of this because you cant be trusted"

    the fact that delong finds your lbpost column a safe harbor to post comments in proves me and everyone else here right about you.
  • Mr. x: Might it not prove more productive to attempt to respctfully respond to and factually rebut Mr. DeLong's comments, wherever you find them, rather than complain about where he chooses to post, publish or utter them?
  • howardx
    "respectfully respond to"

    forget it greet.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 

© 2007-2008 Seven Days Publishing LLC.