Writing Shotgun

RDA’S BECK SAYS HE WARNED HITCHCOCK THAT BUILDING SOCCER FIELDS WOULD BE ILLEGAL

 

Long Beach development czar Craig Beck insists he warned contractor Sean Hitchcock more than a month ago that it would be illegal to build soccer fields on the 8.38 acres of wetlands-adjacent property near Studebaker Road and Loynes Avenue that Hitchcock was planning to purchase from developer Tom Dean for $2.3 million.

“I would be surprised to hear Mr. Hitchcock say he was given permission to do anything like that on that land,” says Beck—executive director of the Redevelopment Agency and director of the city’s Department of Development Services—in a telephone interview from Monterey, where the Long Beach RDA received a communications award at the California Redevelopment Association conference. “Mr. Hitchcock was fully informed relative to the need for getting permits and relative to what permits he would be able to get under the land’s zoning.”

Hitchcock, a successful contractor whose Signal Hill-based 2H Construction company has worked frequently on Long Beach city and school projects, did not respond to several requests by The District Weekly for an interview. But he told LBreport.com that city officials approved of his plans to carve a recreation area into the property.

“I’ve already met with the City before about plans of some kind of venture with them to do open park space, which is what the city seems to want,” Hitchcock told LBreport.com on March 21—the morning after two days of complaints from outraged residents finally brought Long Beach City Manager Pat West to the site to stop the heavy equipment that was scraping and grading the protected land. “I’ve already told them I’m in tune with doing what they want to do.”

Hitchcock wouldn’t say which city officials he had spoken with, but at Tuesday evening’s Beer & Politics forum at Gallagher’s Pub assistant city manager Suzanne Frick revealed that Hitchcock had met with Beck and Third District Councilman Gary DeLong.

Beck confirms that three men discussed Hitchcock’s plans to buy the land—and his plans to convert it into soccer fields—in a meeting in DeLong’s office on the 14th floor of City Hall.

“It was an impromptu meeting—it wasn’t on my calendar,” Beck says. “I got a call from the councilman and popped upstairs. [Hitchcock] expressed a desire to build soccer fields. I said, ‘That sounds good; I’ll look at the zoning.’

“But when I looked at the maps the zoning said the land was brackish ponds and wetlands, and I expressed that to him—before he closed escrow.”

So was Beck surprised on March 20 when he learned that Hitchcock had brought trucks and bulldozers and a huge pile of waste asphalt onto the land, knocking down nest-filled trees, covering up the warrens of burrowing animals and uncovering potential toxins that had been sealed in what used to be a city dump?

“I was surprised after our meeting to find that he had continued to close escrow on that land,” says Beck, “considering that the entitlement challenge had there was so significant.”

But Beck makes it clear that passing judgment is not his job.

“My job is to work with property owners, and I will continue to work with Mr. Hitchcock, walking him through the process on his land,” says Beck. “He has been very cooperative in trying to correct what has been done there.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

  • COASTAL KILLING ZONE
    One thing is for sure, all of this destruction would have never happened under Beck's predecessor, Greg Carpenter. He knew the District well and helped study the zoning for the area, with the resident associations around the Wetlands, quite effectively and professionally, for several years between 2004 and 2006. Same story with Conway's predecessor, boy did SHE know what she was doing. This kind of stuff never happened under them, or Frank Colona.

    And the zoning is clearly spelled out on the property profile, we have seen it many times. And Beck and DeLong have had seminars and punlic meetings about trying to change all of the present designations.

    Gary has tried to grant building rights on this lot, with no input from the residents or adjacent Stakeholders, again and again.

    They are all Negligent, the all breached Duties of Due Care, they violated many Statutes, and if they try to scapegoat Hitchcock, do not be surprised to see him sue the City too. We suspect that DeRong gave this idea the green light. Witnesses apparently saw him and Hitcock Golfing at the Virginia Country Club before the mass slaughter.

    Hitchcock is in big trouble, but it is in his best interest to remember that we are in a comparitive Negligence state. To the extent that he was encouraged, or negligently mis-informed, or mislead, he should fess up. It could save him a ton of money.

    Come on Sean, Gary said...''It sounds good...I like the idea....I'll do everything I can to help you.....F those people in University Park Estates, and in the Belmont Shores Mobile Estates???''and '' Ignore the Wetlands Advocacy groups'' '' they are just critics'' and '' the vocal Minority''.

    We hear things too...and have sources.....


    What an Environmental Nightmare......

    It is so sad to see all of the birds circling and circling because they have no home, no food, and no water anymore.
  • Laurence Goodhue
    Once again:Gary De Long has once again failed to provide honest services and
    must resign not only from any seat on any Wetlands Conservancy
    but the Council Office as well.His conduct in the instant matter is
    disciple.He is essentially a fifth columnist within the Wetlands efforts.
  • Laurence Goodhue
    What you are about to read may seem off topic so far as the instant article is concerned .
    Yet those who have followed the story since it genesis as well as the recent land swap
    deal which so enraged so many the nexus should be easy to detect unless one's olfactory
    senses have be so overwhelmed that they have shut down.

    THIS IS AN OPEN LETTER TO
    MR DEAN SINGLETON,CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF NEWS MEDIA GROUP
    MR.ROBERT FOSTER,MAYOR,CITY OF LONG BEACH,CALIFORNIA

    My original intent was to publish this letter on the comment blog
    site of Mr. Singleton's Grunion Gazette' very good letter in today's
    Spit and Argue Club dealing with a Liquor License for Lucille's-a
    very fine and reputable restaurant owned by pillars of our fine
    hamlet.

    What caught my attention was a comment posted by a credible
    individual recently re-elected as President of a local Home Owners
    Association for a large portion of the Belmont Shore area.

    His comment referenced a statement which he said a member of
    the Planning Commission made: TO WIT:
    "I HAVE LIVED IN THE BELMONT SHORE AREA FOR X AMOUNT
    OF YEARS(for some s-t-r-a-n-g-e reason your paper removed the
    blogged comment;being unable to recall the exact number of years -
    drives the X..but ,if memory serves me correctly- was in the teens .)
    AND I HAVE NEVER FOUND PARKING TO BE A PROBLEM !!!!

    Mr.Singleton if the Commissioner is correct that would suggest
    your editors and publishers are squandering your resources-
    and have been doing so ever since you have owned the Grunion.
    Having followed the Grunion since it was first produced around a
    kitchen table my recollection is that hardly a month goes by when
    the Grunion is devoting space to parking related issues in Belmont
    Shore.Yet the Commissioner claimed,per the comment from
    the credible referenced re-elected HOA President-parking in the area
    a non issue. ARE YOU IN THE BUSINESS OF WASTING THE TIME
    OF YOUR GOOD REPORTERS AND RESOURCES ON NON ISSUES.?


    MR MAYOR:If the Commissioner is correct why is Belmont Shore
    listed as a parking impacted area with so much of the Council's
    and Commission's time spent addressing non issues.

    If on the other hand- the Grunion's coverage is warranted
    and there are parking impact issues-why have you not replaced
    the Commissioner with one that is sensitive to such critical
    issues.

    Laurence B. Goodhue
    Long Beach
  • Laurence Goodhue
    A FOLLOW UP NOTE TO MR SINGLETON-UNDERSCORING WHY YOU WOULD NEVER
    FIND ME EMPLOYED AS A PROOF READER.....

    THE WORD NOT...WAS LEFT OUT IN THE ABOVE OPEN LETTER:
    PARAGRAPH 6
    LINE 6

    should read..THE GRUNION IS NOT DEVOTING SPACE....instead
    of the GRUNION IS DEVOTING....
  • noticed your typos all over
    You also wrote in an earlier comment, "His conduct in the instant matter is
    disciple." by which I'm assuming you mean "despicable."
  • Laurence Goodhue
    ...As indicated,a proof reader I am not....but in the referenced case anyway it is spelled-
    De Long has to go....
  • dan
    So this man wants to put athletic fields where long beach children can play. What a great idea. This land is barren and eye sore. So a few birds don't have a home. My owe my, what will the bird world do.
    For all you wetlands head in muck people, who is more important: KIDS or Birds?
    There are very few athletic facilities for kids to play in. Yes there are parks but not facilitites. Most outdoor athletic events take place in Orange County or San Bernadino.
    Take this ridiculous, owe what about the birds circling for a nest and ask yourself....where did the birds, ants, worms, flys go when your home was built?
    The city should work with this man to take this ugly, smelly eye sore of land and provide facilities for children.
  • Defendant Hitchcocks Hell
    The wildlife retreated to this area, and others so that it could be maintained in the area. The City designed it this way with set aside,conservation zoning in the 70s.

    We bought our homes to be next to these Nature areas which most find Beautiful.

    The kids have plenty of play areas in East Long Beach. If you want to be fair, build some in West Long Beach, and Central Long Beach, and North Long Beach.

    This town, and this County, and this State, have FEW Wetlands or natural habitat spaces. Many Laws protect these spaces, and this lot will never become a sports field. The Light and Noise alone is harmful to the Wetlands, or nesting areas elsewhere, totally objectionable to area residents, illegal on many grounds, and infeasible.

    Without remediating all of the toxics below the clean soil on top, it is very Dangerous, and easily Negligent, to try to add irrigation for water thirsty grass, on top of a dump. This is never done to to contamination spreading concerns, especially right next to the Ocean.

    This is why The Pumpkin Patch was also never built upon. Toxic soil, next to the Ocean, with plumbed in water perking down, is a very tricky and dangerous scenario if you know Civil Engineering and Soils.

    Liquifaction, and lateral subsidence, or sliding, is also a big potential nightmare. The hard cap crust, and clay cap, neds to entirely redesigned, and re installed, after export of the soil this Idiot contaminated. This is going to be a layer by layer affair, spanning years.

    Test sampling, and grade probes, and tests will be demanded soon. As Dump Operator for many Decades, the City of Long Beach has continuing liablity here as Past Lessee and Operator of the City Dump and Salvage # 4 Operations. Bixby also remains liable, as Lessor too.

    Dean probably directed the work, with DeLong.

    We filmed the Grader leave the scene, to go over to Dean's lot, use a key, enter and park over night. Bill Pearl has that still too.
  • Com_Mentor
    dan, dan, dan.
    Would you have ALL birds destroyed so that our kids can have ANOTHER place for organized sports? When all the birds and open parcels are gone would you then be happy? Do you want your kids to not have the opportunity to watch birds or chase bugs and lizards through some weeds on a vacant lot? YOU are planning your child’s future. Why do I have to agree with your lack of foresight regarding what is left to hand over to OUR children when we are done? Look at the Big Picture. Instant gratification is so 90's. See if you can get your head around what Long Beach would look like if we would just fill in every open space we could, for the sake of another place for our children to play"......

    Pretend having a conversation with your child in the future, when your child is grown,
    and YOU had accomplished this goal. Would your child thank you for covering all of the open spaces with groomed turf, or call you a stupid, selfish SOB, because you refused to think ahead? What might that future look like? It would be too late for your grandkids to have a vacant lot to chase lizards and bugs and watch birds doing what they do at their home. And all because the place that your grand or great grandkids may want to play and explore is to you, “This land is barren and eye sore. So a few birds don't have a home. My owe my, what will the bird world do.” (the typo is yours).

    Dan, dan, dan. Parcel by parcel, yard by yard, without those with more foresight than you, would be MY CHILDREN’S future as well. I won’t have it. Many of the people you attempt to call derogatory names won’t have it. Those parcels don’t come back. So, I’m genuinely sorry for you if you don’t see the “big picture”, but if you can’t do that on your own, a few lines by anyone in a blog won’t suffice as an education. So dan, if you would be so kind, please respond to my thoughts about your comment.
  • Com_Mentor
    dan,
    I appologize for taking more room on a board needing a large amount of space for more important thoughts, but......
    Your statement: "The city should work with this man to take this ugly, smelly eye sore of land and provide facilities for children."

    I don’t want the City’s help with doing anything to a vacant lot so my child can play there. Just make a plan to keep them from being all gone, and then protect them from being harmed by development. I want the city of Long Beach, and the good mayor that I voted for, to put MORE TEETH in the mechanism that is currently in use to keep this from happening.

    My child loves ugly, smelly, eye sore dirt lots. He does not require "facilities" as you state your child needs. Did you not get to experience this as a child? It's nothing to be afraid of. I would be happy to let my preschooler introduce you to the intricacies of enjoying "dirt, weeds, bugs, worms, birds and fly’s" on a dirt parcel. And all this without a rule book, or lines or whistles or uniforms. Of course I would insist on being there so he wouldn't tease you with a wiggling worm or nasty ladybug.

    My son and I appreciate the soccer field that he plays on, but I need to keep an eye on HIS children's future as well.

    Good day sir.
  • Laurence Goodhue
    NOTE TO DAN:

    First and foremost there is something called the LAW.

    In a real sense the law is the only thing that separates mankind from the birds-and the
    animals.In the instant case the law is formidable,not only at local,but Federal level.
    $50,000.00 day fines and three years in Federal Prison is what faces some down the
    road in Huntington Beach.Check the OC Register from a few days ago about a case,not
    unlike this one where the baroque and obtuse tried to flaunt the law.

    Certainly kids need a place to play.Controlling coastal law,wisely limits the type of
    activity within the Coastal Zone.With astute management, upland areas can be
    developed to meet the non coastal dependent recreational activities.

    Hopefully you would agree, one of the things kids will learn and keep with
    them when engaging in those recreational activities is an appreciation and respect
    for the rules of the game.In the game of life the LAW is the controlling rule.In the
    instant case the player(s) have been handed a YELLOW AND RED CARD.
  • Coastal BS Meter
    Come on guys,,,what do you think that he is going to say?? Do you think that he is going to admit Liability? Why don't you ask him why his men oversaw all of this damage, and why the guys doing the work, said that they were working for the City, had City Approval, and had the City there directing and observing all of the work?
  • Fed Up
    Long Beach citizens are expected to follow all laws, ordinances and codes. However it appears Long Beach officials and their long time friends are above the law, so they think. Recall! All involved should be removed from office. Citizens need to start holding elected officials accountable when they fail to protect us, fail to set an example or fail to fulfill their promises or show any signs of crooked dealings or conflicts of interest--then we need to remove them from office. If the next elected official fails then remove that one too. Don't just wait for their terms to end, send a message they had better do a good job or else. Maybe then someday we can get decent officials in office.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 

© 2007-2008 Seven Days Publishing LLC.