The Daily Briefing

UPDATE ON SECOND STREET SHOOTING

 

As the Press-Telegram’s John Canalis reports this morning, 25-year-old Ernest Raymond Rodriguez of Anaheim–the man shot by Long Beach police just after midnight May 28 in the 2500 block of Second Street–”is no longer in custody and recovering in the care of relatives,” according to “authorities.”

This despite the fact that, according to the P-T, prosecutors “on May 29 charged Rodriguez with three felonies–resisting arrest, illegal possession of a police officer’s baton and vandalism, said LBPD spokeswoman Lisa Massacani.

“In addition, Rodriguez was charged with resisting an officer’s orders by using threats or violence, a misdemeanor.”

There’s no arraignment date set in Rodriguez’s case, and he “was released without having to post bond,” Canalis writes.

“Bail was not required, in part, because Rodriguez had no criminal record and the family showed a willingness to cooperate,” Long Beach Police Sgt. Erik Herzog told the P-T.

“However, Herzog said $50,000 bail will be imposed, and an existing arrest warrant will be executed, if Rodriguez does not show up in court or leaves the care of his family.”

And here’s the update on Rodriguez’s condition, which could explain this complex arrangement–if we read between the lines. Or not.

“Rodriguez sustained injuries to his upper and lower torso, Herzog said, adding that he could not be more specific about the types or number of wounds,” Canalis writes.

(Do you wonder why Long Beach police aren’t more forthcoming sometimes? I do.)

“He’s in stable condition, but as a result of his injuries, he has some difficulty walking,” Herzog told the P-T, describing Rodriguez’s condition. “And further to that, he’s had some surgeries to help him out.”

Indeed.

Tags: , , , , , ,

  • eric
    If I can accurately read between the lines, sounds like the guy suffered an injury to his nuts (can I say nuts?).
  • Jerry Farnsworth
    Why would anyone give additional evidence to the LBPD to destroy?
  • ruehlesatool
    Stop with the accusations M R. If you have information, ie; witnesses, provide that information to the police so they can be interviewed. Are you withholding evidence? Geez you're a tool
  • Regarding, "(Do you wonder why Long Beach police aren’t more forthcoming sometimes? I do.)"

    Theo, I have a lot of questions about this incident too. But sometimes information is "with held" for a couple of reasons including protecting the privacy of individuals involved, and also, pending trials and hearings lawyers for both sides have a right to prepare their cases. Consider if this goes to a trial and requires jury selection. The jury reserves the right to review the evidence before the public does.
    It's also better to give no information rather than wrong information.
  • Mike Ruehle
    I find it interesting the fact people have approached me claiming to have been in Legends that night and told a hugely different story. One of them proved to me they were there when it happened by showing me pictures of the body laying in the street that was clearly taken from Legends patio. If the police report is true, why are people I don't even know telling me such a different story?
blog comments powered by Disqus
 

© 2007-2008 Seven Days Publishing LLC.