The Daily Briefing

CONGRESSIONAL REP. LAURA RICHARDSON UNDER INVESTIGATION

 

In case you haven’t heard, our own Congressional Rep. Laura Richardson (D-escent) is now under investigation.

Per the Press-Telegram, LBReport.com, Politico.com, and our buds at LAObserved.com, the House Ethics Committee voted unanimously Thursday to look into whether all was on the up-and-up when the Congresswoman got her Sacramento house returned to her after it was sold at a foreclosure auction.

Richardson is in august company: Rep. Maxine Water (D-Los Angeles) is also under investigation.

“The votes on Waters and Richardson marked the first time that any referrals from the independent Office of Congressional Ethics had led to a full-blown investigation by the ethics committee,” Politico’s John Bresnahan writes.

And wow, I mean really, how many congressional representatives from Long Beach have lost their houses to foreclosure and then mysteriously gotten them back in a deal that sealed the lips of their house’s prospective buyer—who’d all but closed escrow before losing it himself?

Oh, wait, I know—none of them. Until now.

You know there’s a prepared statement from Richardson in this somewhere, right? Because there is.

Richardson’s spokesman referred inquiries to a prepared statement from the congresswoman,” the P-T’s John Canalis wrote Thursday. And here ’tis:

“Like 4.3 million Americans in the last year who faced financial problems because of a personal crisis like a divorce, death in the family, unexpected job and living changes and an erroneous property sale, all of which I have experienced in the span of slightly over a year, I have worked to resolve a personal financial situation,” Richardson’s statement runs.

“But unlike other Americans, I have been subjected to premature judgments, speculation and baseless distractions that will finally be addressed in a fair, unbiased, bi-partisan evaluation of the facts.”

Let’s see—”premature judgments, speculation and baseless distractions.”

Do you suppose one reason why Richardson attracts attention from us printer’s devils is because she’s a public official?

Mmm, could be.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • DWR
    Down With Richardson (DWR)
  • howardx
    about time, im going to baselessly speculate that richardson is a cancer that needs to be excised, we dont need corrupt dems in congress.
  • Mike Ruehle
    Is there any hope for the city of Long Beach when its residents vote to have such a person represent them? Certainly there must be better and more honest representatives.
  • DWR
    I'm sure you know she reps not just LB, but also Sig Hill, Compton, Carson and pieces of other towns.
  • Mike Ruehle
    Certainly. However Long Beach residents are the most familiar with her behaviors beginning when she was their councilperson, yet they still voted to retain her as their representative.

    No wonder guys like Mayor Foster and Councilman DeLong feel comfortable betraying the people who voted them into office. Enriching their personal developer friends with taxpayers' money and other unsavory deals is almost expected out of our Long Beach elected leaders.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 

© 2007-2008 Seven Days Publishing LLC.