News

WHAT THE MAN SAID TO THE MARTIAN

 

Take Ray Bradbury’s advice on Acres


PHOTO by DANIEL DE BOOM

I was back under the tin roof at Acres of Books that Ray Bradbury especially loves when it rains, and when I went to prowl early for Bradbury books—they don’t come through so often, but I found first-edition Bester instead—someone had Lee Hazlewood playing in that mysterious very last room, where the shack-and-shingle acoustics lift loud voices to the ceiling: “Seems we’re always doing something to hurt each other,” said Lee. His obituary was clipped and stapled to the bookshelf in the room where they put Bradbury, 88 and unafraid to say “Goddamn!” and “Jesus Christ!” as he slaps his forehead and unafraid to say: I love this place. Save this place. Do not move it or change it.

Fahrenheit 451 is the Bradbury story everyone is remembering right now—where the books are all destroyed and only memories are left, and that’s certainly so appropriate to the occasion that it even stings a bit. But Fahrenheit fits best after Acres is flattened and plowed under sometime during the next year. (Why can’t they build around Acres? Bradbury asked; I asked our staff expert Theo Douglas and he said they don’t want to because it would take more work and cost more money.) The story now is “Usher II” from The Martian Chronicles, where the bureaucrats (with Dismantlers—Bradbury’s capitals—somewhere behind them) come to destroy the house built on books: “You know the law. Strict to the letter,” says their man. “No books, no houses, nothing to be produced which in any way suggests ghosts, vampires, fairies or any creature of the imagination.” He suffers a particularly appropriate end: “Do you know why I’ve done this to you? Because you burned Mr. Poe’s books without really reading them. You took other people’s advice that they needed burning.” So who was it that suggested Acres needed burning? Craig Beck already told our editor Will Swaim and reporter Theo Douglas that CityPlace was a development mistake, though it happened long before he was even working for the RDA so he can’t be held responsible. But there must have been another person—who held Craig Beck’s job way back when—who thought CityPlace was a great idea, and so CityPlace was built. And once Acres is razed and replaced with a set of live-work lofts—obviously necessary in a collapsed housing market where foreclosures offer the only growth opportunity—we can look forward to an apology from Craig Beck’s successor in 2018, who will admit that Acres should have been saved. But Acres will be gone. Luckily our future man will then present a brand-new plan to sink the Queen Mary and turn it into luxury condominiums, which this time once-and-for-all will restore downtown Long Beach the glory it would have always had if it had never torn all its landmarks down.

Of LBPost.com’s reader-selected 10 worst decisions in Long Beach history, four are explicitly downtown. (Many of the rest are linked to downtown.) The story of development there is simple: approve, demolish and apologize. Acres’ situation is complex—no one knows now if the store will come back or if the owners will take their buy-out and retire. But why were they—and the rest of the business owners on the block—chased out? Are these live-work skyrises really what we need now when the city is millions of dollars in debt? Or should we stop getting rid of what few uniquely Long Beach things we have left until we solve more fundamental problems? There were plenty of media there to meet Ray Bradbury—apparently some of us felt this was an important event—but who was there from the city who could answer these kinds of questions? I didn’t see Suja. I have no idea what Craig Beck looks like. Maybe he was one of the three young girls, or the guy with the devil-lock who liked Fahrenheit 451, or the boy who had to explain to a videocamera what he liked about the Martian Chronicles and why—it’s one of the best American books of the 20th century so don’t worry, kid, you can’t be wrong.

I would have loved to see someone explain right to Ray Bradbury’s face why it was a good thing that Acres is going to be torn down: How it would be back better than ever because it’s such a routine simple thing to move ten million books into some accommodating new home, especially when the book business is just bursting with surplus revenue, and then there’s the generous RDA buy-out, too, which works out to 30 cents a book and erases any argument for saving Acres anyway. All parties concerned are now legal, satisfied and happy even though the Acres staff thanked me for everything I’d written the way you thank a physician at a funeral. But Bradbury had explained it to himself and everyone in “The Off Season,” too, where the man tells the Martian that the “old got to give way for the new—that’s the law of give and take.” “Think of the money!” that man tells his wife later. You can’t stop something that is going to make a lot of people a lot of money with stories about rainy afternoons and first editions, or you can’t unless you are Ray Bradbury. He asked us all if we wanted him to call the mayor—he said he’d done it before, and it worked then but it’s a much worse situation now. But do it anyway, Ray. We need you, and at the very least I would love to hear just how the mayor tells you no.

Tags: , , ,

  • Dave Wielenga
    I've reported this comment to our moderator.
  • The previous comment was removed due to offensive language.
  • 835
    It's always a special day when one of America's few remaining literary geniuses steps up to defend the good things in life. I want my children reading this guy, f*** Harry Potter
  • wswaim
    I love the Angus Young look.
  • Chris Ziegler
    'i command you to love me.' - r. bradbury 2008
  • I was there for the occasion (the tall guy with the ponytail wearing the Blizzard hat).

    It was great to see Bradbury in person, particularly in that kind of setting, but overall I found it to be a somewhat depressing affair.

    The fate of Acres seemed to be echoed in Bradbury's own failing health, and I almost felt we were watching two funerals in progress, standing there in that room.

    Neither of them seemed to have very long left to live on this Earth.
  • Maybe not, Steve, but Bradbury at least was still full of fight.
  • Andy
    When I first moved into the Lafayette, there was a used bookstore on the corner that took up the spaces where the African art store, the salon, and the former space for Open bookstore.

    It was ramshackle and loosely organized, and run by two old ladies. One of the more interesting parts was the large aisle of porn directly opposite the checkout, where creepy guilt worked better than any security system. They lost their lease and I'm not sure where everything eventually was carted off.

    But it was a great place to spend idle Sat mornings, wandering the collections and finding things you didn't know you needed. When it cleared out, I was allowed to go in a rummage through the things deemed not worthy of moving, from which I got a collection of pulp paperbacks and 1920s National Geographics.

    I still think of those ladies when I look at those paperbacks and magazines, and wonder if anyone ever remembers their book buying experience at a Barnes and Noble.

    Long live Acres of Books, but get your memories now.
  • Bradley Zint
    This whole ordeal sadly reminds me yet again of why I have nicknamed Long Beach the Wrong Beach more often than not.

    Long Beach now unfortunately continues its civic history of “brilliant” ideas, namely tearing down The Pike that once made the LBC the place to be in L.A. on the weekends (and, many years later, replacing it with a newer yet tasteless, character-less, glorified strip mall with a fake roller coaster reminiscent of the older, more real one that they tore down, too); building a breakwater that would turn the once-popular beaches into seaside deserts of emptiness (not to mention the infamous distinction of being the oceanic trash tanks of the Southland’s waste); and now bulldozing a bookstore sacred to many.

    What great scheme will the city come up with next? Free all the fish in its beloved Aquarium of the Pacific in the name of “fish rights”?

    -Bradley Zint
    Edgartown, Mass.
  • Lisa
    I cannot understand how we had a visit from a timeless, world-class author in the second district and no political representation was present. No Suja, no Foster, no Lowenthal of any sort, hell no lackey of any kind came to greet this legend. What, was there some lame ass ribbon cutting going on at the same time?! Its just embarassing and is a perfect example of the short sightedness that is a constant in this city. Luxury condos my ass...
  • Erron Elliot Olson
    Yeah, Lisa. The entire time all this RDA bullshit was going on Suja never stepped ONE FOOT into Acres. NOT ONE. What representation.

    I'm surprise I didn't see her here for Bradbury, because it woulda been a great photo op (a la Burt Grimm's). Oh yeah, she DID step foot into our parking lot when they demolished the buildings adjacent to us. How nice.
  • Andy
    Because she loves her some developer cash for her next campaign.

    That or she's in Austria "scoping" builders for the hydrogen-powered monorail to Belmont Shore..
  • Erron Elliot Olson
    Andy, and all of our patrons, we appreciate the support you have given us. Sincerely.

    At least we still have Open.
  • Andy-Do you still live at the Lafayette?
  • Andy
    No, still downtown though. My 10 years in apt. 632 were like an extended dorm stay, with great people (mix of old, young, crazy, and creative) and that labyrith of a basement has hundreds of stories to tell. Turn out the lights and go exploring...it's like being in Saw III. Also, Sharon, the office manager, is a doll.
  • Andrew Williams
    Long live Ray and Acres of Books.
  • RDA
    LONG LIVE THE RDA

    DEATH TO ALL THINGS OLD
  • Gunther
    What's interesting to me from this topic is the RDA's involvement with a bunch of crappy projects. I don't think we can point to another city run agency that has a worse track record then these guys. Does every city have an RDA? Why does ours suck so bad?
  • Andreas
    If craig beck thinks city place was such a mistake then why does he back the city place lofts that are part of the overall development plan, which for those of you that aren't familiar are the "lofts" built in the albertsons parking lot that look like complete crap. Check this video for a cameo from mr. beck himself. http://lang.presstelegram.com/video/082707_real...

    i can't wait to see what the RDA has in store for the AOB site when they finally clear the land.
  • Andy
    Thanks for pointing that out..I missed it in the article.

    So, City Place was a mistake? The stores or the housing? Oh, I bet he wishes he never said that.

    And there's nothing wrong with the "lofts" in the parking lot as long as you don't mind living in a building that looks like a U-Stor-it storage facility.
  • Andrew Williams
    The LBCC is a bunch of pussies. You'd break an old man's heart--a man who has more talent, bravery, courage and intelligence in his pinkie than you all have in your entire corpulent bodies--for a fucking Quiznos'. Fuck you all. Molotov cocktails on the house.
  • Andy
    So, the Vault 350 is now for sale...look for the RDA to propose spending millions of your tax dollars to acquire it and turn it into more texture-coated housing and unoccupied retail spaces...and then sell it to a developer...that they then get a kickback for. Here's an idea..how about a cultural venue that would bring folks downtown or keep it as a club where old punk bands play?
blog comments powered by Disqus
 

© 2007-2008 Seven Days Publishing LLC.