Comments on: SIX MORE YEARS!

By: 1992Plaintiff

1992Plaintiff — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:43:49 +0000

I like Judge DiLoreto. He has a confidence borne of experience and education that you just don't find very often. If he made errors of judgment, perhaps he is, at the root of it all, human and subject to the same condition that afflicts us all — our humanity. With all of the education and time spent in the company of community leaders, and in front of attorneys while adjudicating civil and criminal suits you'd think Judge DiLoreto might have earned the right to a mulligan. But there will always be those who cannot overlook their personal agenda nor abandon their love of nitpicking to keep the Judge looking over his shoulder.

By: ised8utoo

ised8utoo — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:31:37 +0000

What a lazy judge. Doesn't even listen to anything being said in his courtroom. I would certainly never vote for him. He doesn't want to work for the people only to serve himself.

By: 835

835 — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:06:15 +0000

Isn’t this the same DiLoreto clan that unsuccesfully sued the Downey school district for refusing to post the Ten Commandments on a public school baseball field sign? Glad to see he’s interpreting our laws…

By: 835

835 — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 03:06:15 +0000

By: Dwight K Snider

Dwight K Snider — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 02:20:42 +0000

Citizen Journalist Quote of the Day: “Our legal system is based on the principle that an independent, fair, and competent judiciary will interpret and apply the laws that govern us. The role of the judiciary is central to American concepts of justice and the rule of law. Intrinsic to this code are the precepts that judges, individually and collectively, must respect and honor the judicial office as a public trust and strive to enhance and maintain confidence in our legal system.”

(Source: Preamble to the California Code of Judicial Ethics.)

By: Dwight K Snider

Dwight K Snider — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:20:42 +0000

(Source: Preamble to the California Code of Judicial Ethics.)

By: Will Swaim

Will Swaim — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:23:37 +0000

Great point, Michael. In fairness, the judge called me today to say that my article was a “hatchet job.” If he’s right, he proves my point: most voters haven’t got the time or expertise to make judgments about judges. I had two weeks and, if the judge is right, still screwed it up.

By: Michael

Michael — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:01:27 +0000

Your article doesn’t mention that, unless he does his own typing, Di Loreto’s improper correspondence was typed for him by a public employee paid by taxpayers. I don’t recall giving him that permission. This is the type of misuse of office that, if it were done by a Democrat, would be considered grounds for indictment.

By: Michael

Michael — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:59:51 +0000

By: Will Swaim

Will Swaim — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:23:37 +0000