Reviews

BRAD PITT IS INVOLVED

 

‘Burn After Reading’ is an astute, brutal comedy

It’s weird, but I don’t even think of Brad Pitt as an actor anymore. I think of him as a photograph—a still image in a tabloid looking serene and carrying around 15 babies. But Pitt does, in fact, act in Burn After Reading, the Coen brothers’ follow-up to last year’s stunning cinematic tension headache No Country for Old Men. And he’s fucking funny. As Chad Feldheimer, clueless personal trainer at a Washington, DC gym called Hardbodies, he comes into possession of a CD containing highly classified CIA intelligence. Along with Hardbodies coworker Linda Litzky (Frances McDormand at her chirpy best), Feldheimer fumbles through a blackmail attempt on ex-CIA analyst Osbourne Cox (John Malkovich): “I thought you might be worried . . . about the security . . . of your shit.”

Burn After Reading is an astute, brutal comedy about infidelity, modern idiocy, paranoia, and the CIA. Set to thundering action-movie drums, the characters brew immense tempests over the most mundane nonsense. The acting is uniformly fantastic—George Clooney, Tilda Swinton, Richard Jenkins—but no character is particularly likeable, and all border on the cartoonish. Burn After Reading is sillier and less thematically cohesive than Fargo or Raising Arizona, but it takes a turn exactly one hour in that reminds you just how fucked up and brilliant the Coens can be. Brad Pitt is involved.

BURN AFTER READING
DIR. JOEL AND ETHAN COEN | RATED R | OPENS FRI AT THEATERS EVERYWHERE

Tags: , , ,

  • Kelson
    This is the best movie reviewer we can get in Long Beach?

    Geez. Could we bring back any of the CSULB students? Or at least just put a stubby hyperlink to a real review?

    Maybe it is enough for three of your readers to know it is "sillier" and "less thematically cohesive," or that this might be the first time George Clooney has been found to actually act (let alone fantastically), but someone more interested in film (or at least this film) might want some points regarding style, composition, camera work, relevance to particular events, past or present, continuations of themes explored in earlier works, etc.

    Or at least I would have thought the editors might be interested in these things?

    Hello?
blog comments powered by Disqus
 

© 2007-2008 Seven Days Publishing LLC.