<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DON&#8217;T FORGET THE BUBBLE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedistrictweekly.com/2008/daily/writing-shotgun/dont-forget-the-bubble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/2008/daily/writing-shotgun/dont-forget-the-bubble/</link>
	<description>Long Beach News, Arts, Music &#38;  Entertainment for Long Beach</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:33:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam Lowry</title>
		<link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/2008/daily/writing-shotgun/dont-forget-the-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-1637</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Lowry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 02:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedistrictweekly.com/daily/writing-shotgun/2008/02/05/dont-forget-the-bubble/#comment-1637</guid>
		<description>I did not forget the bubble, though it did seem like an unnecessary and confusing step that couldn&#039;t be worth the trouble it&#039;ll probably cause. And yes, my Decline to State status did cause a minor commotion among the polling place volunteers, as if they hadn&#039;t yet had to deal with a non-partisan voter asking for a ballot, or even a democratic ballot, since I was deep in the heart of 7-figure Belmont Shore (C&#039;mon, Mabel! Let&#039;s go to the ballot box and help ensure we keep our icy grip on the status quo!)

I wanted to vote for Ron Paul, but the Republicans didn&#039;t want us crazy non-conformists folks casting votes for their candidates. I&#039;m sure the Grand Imperial Dragons of the GOP have a strategy behind that, but as a regular Amurrrikin guy with a vote, it just pisses me off. Instead, I voted for Barack Obama, whose name compels my Mac to put dotted red lines under it because apparently the mainstream technology world is not ready for Barack&#039;s jelly.

I realize that Paul and Obama (there&#039;s that gaddamn red line again!) may be opposites. Instead of voting on adherence to ideology, I cast my vote for the candidate that seems the least greedy, slimy, ignorant, inarticulate, or unethical. A candidate actually gets points in my book for being a little iconoclastic, so the obvious choice for me was Ron Paul. Maybe if he could have chosen a running mate who would have played Pinky to his Brain....

My voting experience today was yet another clear message from the Oz-Wizards of the two-party system: choose a side OR SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES! AH HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAA!!!!!

I think I will pay no attention to the men behind the curtain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not forget the bubble, though it did seem like an unnecessary and confusing step that couldn&#8217;t be worth the trouble it&#8217;ll probably cause. And yes, my Decline to State status did cause a minor commotion among the polling place volunteers, as if they hadn&#8217;t yet had to deal with a non-partisan voter asking for a ballot, or even a democratic ballot, since I was deep in the heart of 7-figure Belmont Shore (C&#8217;mon, Mabel! Let&#8217;s go to the ballot box and help ensure we keep our icy grip on the status quo!)</p>
<p>I wanted to vote for Ron Paul, but the Republicans didn&#8217;t want us crazy non-conformists folks casting votes for their candidates. I&#8217;m sure the Grand Imperial Dragons of the GOP have a strategy behind that, but as a regular Amurrrikin guy with a vote, it just pisses me off. Instead, I voted for Barack Obama, whose name compels my Mac to put dotted red lines under it because apparently the mainstream technology world is not ready for Barack&#8217;s jelly.</p>
<p>I realize that Paul and Obama (there&#8217;s that gaddamn red line again!) may be opposites. Instead of voting on adherence to ideology, I cast my vote for the candidate that seems the least greedy, slimy, ignorant, inarticulate, or unethical. A candidate actually gets points in my book for being a little iconoclastic, so the obvious choice for me was Ron Paul. Maybe if he could have chosen a running mate who would have played Pinky to his Brain&#8230;.</p>
<p>My voting experience today was yet another clear message from the Oz-Wizards of the two-party system: choose a side OR SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES! AH HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAA!!!!!</p>
<p>I think I will pay no attention to the men behind the curtain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Lowry</title>
		<link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/2008/daily/writing-shotgun/dont-forget-the-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-12144</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Lowry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedistrictweekly.com/daily/writing-shotgun/2008/02/05/dont-forget-the-bubble/#comment-12144</guid>
		<description>I did not forget the bubble, though it did seem like an unnecessary and confusing step that couldn&#039;t be worth the trouble it&#039;ll probably cause. And yes, my Decline to State status did cause a minor commotion among the polling place volunteers, as if they hadn&#039;t yet had to deal with a non-partisan voter asking for a ballot, or even a democratic ballot, since I was deep in the heart of 7-figure Belmont Shore (C&#039;mon, Mabel! Let&#039;s go to the ballot box and help ensure we keep our icy grip on the status quo!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wanted to vote for Ron Paul, but the Republicans didn&#039;t want us crazy non-conformists folks casting votes for their candidates. I&#039;m sure the Grand Imperial Dragons of the GOP have a strategy behind that, but as a regular Amurrrikin guy with a vote, it just pisses me off. Instead, I voted for Barack Obama, whose name compels my Mac to put dotted red lines under it because apparently the mainstream technology world is not ready for Barack&#039;s jelly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I realize that Paul and Obama (there&#039;s that gaddamn red line again!) may be opposites. Instead of voting on adherence to ideology, I cast my vote for the candidate that seems the least greedy, slimy, ignorant, inarticulate, or unethical. A candidate actually gets points in my book for being a little iconoclastic, so the obvious choice for me was Ron Paul. Maybe if he could have chosen a running mate who would have played Pinky to his Brain....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My voting experience today was yet another clear message from the Oz-Wizards of the two-party system: choose a side OR SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES! AH HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAA!!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think I will pay no attention to the men behind the curtain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not forget the bubble, though it did seem like an unnecessary and confusing step that couldn&#8217;t be worth the trouble it&#8217;ll probably cause. And yes, my Decline to State status did cause a minor commotion among the polling place volunteers, as if they hadn&#8217;t yet had to deal with a non-partisan voter asking for a ballot, or even a democratic ballot, since I was deep in the heart of 7-figure Belmont Shore (C&#8217;mon, Mabel! Let&#8217;s go to the ballot box and help ensure we keep our icy grip on the status quo!)</p>
<p>I wanted to vote for Ron Paul, but the Republicans didn&#8217;t want us crazy non-conformists folks casting votes for their candidates. I&#8217;m sure the Grand Imperial Dragons of the GOP have a strategy behind that, but as a regular Amurrrikin guy with a vote, it just pisses me off. Instead, I voted for Barack Obama, whose name compels my Mac to put dotted red lines under it because apparently the mainstream technology world is not ready for Barack&#8217;s jelly.</p>
<p>I realize that Paul and Obama (there&#8217;s that gaddamn red line again!) may be opposites. Instead of voting on adherence to ideology, I cast my vote for the candidate that seems the least greedy, slimy, ignorant, inarticulate, or unethical. A candidate actually gets points in my book for being a little iconoclastic, so the obvious choice for me was Ron Paul. Maybe if he could have chosen a running mate who would have played Pinky to his Brain&#8230;.</p>
<p>My voting experience today was yet another clear message from the Oz-Wizards of the two-party system: choose a side OR SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES! AH HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAA!!!!!</p>
<p>I think I will pay no attention to the men behind the curtain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
