What a misleading headline - and so needlessly too!

The headline suggested a demolition of both Acres AND the next-door buildings. It would have taken no more (indeed fewer) letters and syllables (and more standard English, to boot) to write: "Demolition today of buildings next to Acres of Books."

Of course, this sort of headline, suggesting an erroneous and thereby panic-inspiring situation, does get reader attention. It got mine, because I had been under the impression - confirmed in your actual story text - that Acres still has time.

Fine, I'll change it.

What is holding up the progress toward getting rid of that last holdout for meaningful Change down there? We need Acres of Rubble before we can have what any self respecting citizen is demanding for that poorly occupied space--a decent return on the taxpayers investment! How do you think we will meet our future expanding expenses without maximizing our asset valuations? For God's sake, get out of the way!

After they demolished the pandemonium i cant cry any more. I cant wait till those condos go for 10 grand. PS Let Acres go... Bring back Smittys Book Store on 4th!

Yes, Acres of Books is the sole impediment to the the stucco box transformation of Long Beach into that shimmering Quizno's/Carl's Jr./99 Cent Store city by the exhaust-choked Port, confirming everyone's belief that Long Beach is actually part of Orange County. Just not the rich part.

Who is going to live in the 450 condos they build on the site? Why doesn't anyone ask that question? I've seen the kind of people that buy/lease condos, and looking around at my neighbors (whom I happen not to loathe or feel ashamed of) I don't see the demographic they're reaching for. Maybe there is a factory somewhere churning out office jockeys in striped shirts..... wait, I remember now, they're called MBA programs. The truth of the matter is that more condos don't equal affordable housing or "revitalization". We'll still have thousands of people living on the margins and on the street. The city and the RDA want to push the working class people further inland. The people who work in the malls and serve you your lattes and clean the restaurant toilets just aren't pretty enough to deserve to live downtown. That's what this fight is all about, because anyone who really knows Acres of Books knows it not only as a bookstore but as a bastion of social equality. EVERYONE is welcome at Acres. This makes people like Suja and Theo uneasy. After all, what self respecting white collar pantywaist wants to dirty themselves by mixing with the hoi poloi? I'm not against the project, though, I've seen the building plan and it has lots of awnings and little manicured lawns where the homeless will find some shelter in the wee hours of the night. And as the proud new residents of the condos wake up on their Ethan Allen sheet-set with matching chamois and pull on velour track suits for their morning jog and make their way down endlessly uniform corridors to the unnecessarily large freight elevators and out into the smoggy Long Beach morning they will be greeted by the smell of urine and the jangling of a cup and the toothless maw of a man laughing mirthlessly: the last laugh, echoing on the walls and shiny cars lined neatly in the subterranean parking lot. Can I get a Hallelejuh?

poodle finkerstein, fortunately I think the homeless will eventually move out of downtown so your scenario won't come true. I'm actually pretty optimistic that the demographic in downtown is changing (driven mostly by these higher end residential developments). It's not as fast as some would like but we are getting there. The next step is better retail to serve the changing demographic.

It would seem to be far more cost effective to just round up all the less desirable people down there and have them put in remote camps where they would not be contaminating our environment or blighting our visuals when we promenade...but then there would be no development money sloshing about so I DO see the point in destroying the heritage buildings--they really only deserve our contempt anyway inasmuch as what we build is so superior and will doubtless last several decades.

Oh yeah G.F. Babbitt, they better hurry up with that project since we're guaranteed to get a fantastic return on taxpayer expenditures...just like every other ballyhooed L.B. retail redevelopment (see PIKE) that was supposed to team with tourists and flood the city coffers with revenue?
If you still believe that line, I got a bridge to sell you...

Long live Acres of Books!!!

The current downtown construction projects should offer instruction in how greater efficiencies might be instituted when building the condos replacing that Acres of Books eyesore. Rather than simply awarding jobs to every Tomas, Richardo, and Geraldo who comes along, labor contracts might be signed with the governments of Jalisco, Oaxaca, Michoacan--the several states, such that each could compete to exclusively provide labor at a reduced total cost to the contractors. It's time we wised up and took advantage of the catbird's seat we find ourselves sitting in.

I was concerned that due to the credit crunch and housing downturn the proposed developments for 90802 would not go forward had they not already begun. So I'm glad to hear that this development is going forward as I was glad to see the earth movers on Third and Daisy beginning that mego condo highrise. I own a condo in 90802 and I'm not particularly fond of many of the behaviors of the neighbors of my complex. I'm not talking about the homeless who I don't distain or fear. I'm talking about the families living in the substandard housing all around 90802. I'm not the least bit unpleased to see them displaced. A lot of them (I'm guessing 15 to 20 percent) behave in really unneighborly/ghetto ways. It may take a decade or so to completely remake 90802 into a zip code with a much higher median income but for me it will be worth the wait. With that change I predict the percentage of people who act in really ghetto/unneighborly ways will drop.

What I wish, though it is impossible, is that I could PICK the type of economic diversity I want in 90802. I would gladly pepper 90802 with low-income housing for the disabled and for people 65+. Seniors and the disabled, in my opinion, are not typically problem neighbors. But I have no power to do such picking. So I'd rather see the majority of my current neighbors priced out of 90802 because 15%-20% of them make 90802 a crappy place to live with their ghetto ways. When 90802 is remade I won't be among the high income inhabitants. But I'd rather be broke among the moneyed and better behaved than relatively moneyed among the low-income and unneighborly. I'm sick of seeing people throw trash on the street. I'm sick of seeing people not pick up after their dogs. I'm sick of seeing people keep chickens/hens in their front yards. I'm sick of not being able to even say something nice to someone while waiting for the light like "Oh, what a pretty dress your little girl has on." because the adult does not speak English. I'm sick of overly loud ranchero and rap music that I can hear in my home with all my windows closed. I'm sick of hearing kids screaming at earsplit level in the vacant lot across the alley when there is a public park right across the street. I'm sick of watching kids tie trash bags to public signs to play tetherball because their adults are too lazy to walk them a block to Chavez park. I'm sick of stomping on the roaches who come out at night to feast on the bread people throw into the street in front of their homes in the morning to feed the pigeons. I'm sick of stepping over oil stains on the sidewalk which come from the dripping goop the "corn on the cob cart" man slathers over the sticks of corn which I'm sure he sells without a health permit. And I am sick sick sick of the vegetable truck icecream man who plays tin music box Christmas music all year round. I love Christmas music and this icecream truck man is just ruining it. Whatever negative comment might be able to be made about the people who will occupy the newly built condo units going up around 90802, I seriously doubt they will bring the kind of behaviors of which I am sick.

Hey Adreana, while I'd love to see LB less ghetto (and I share your sentiments about the trash-throwing folks and taggers)...you might think about moving to Irvine.

I live in that stucco-box adjacent housing, in a 100-year old house that I've spent a couple years rehabbing. And some off the nicest, sweetest folks walk by, English-speaking or not, so that's a bit of a broad stroke to condemn everyone who's not just like you.

But you're not cut out for a real urban environment. For well over 100 years kids in cities, scream and play wherever they can. Roaches are part of the urban ecosystem whether folks are tidy or not. And music, whether with tinkling ice-cream man bells or with extra distorted Kraco bass speakers, is also an endemic part of real cities.

What you want is the sterile, faux urban areas of the OC or the New York City experience that's actually in Vegas. I moved to LBC from Redondo because RB was getting mega-mansioned and LB ain't ever gonna be that.

Andy, the Irvine comment is unfair. Just because people want to see downtown classed up a bit does not mean they want Irvine. Irvine sucks and we all agree about that. But higher end condos, retail and the people that go along with it doesn't have to be sterile and boring like Irvine. There are homeless and crappy people in SF but you don't pay as much attention because it's in moderation and there is also a good mix of high end stuff. Yes, true urban environments have some of the problems mentioned above but there is a medium. We've got the crappy stuff. Now let's continue to work in some of the nicer stuff.

And as far as LB not getting mega mansioned, you clearly haven't spent time in Belmont Heights, Naples, or the Peninsula. Plenty of mega mansions going up there.

Which is why I don't live in Belmont, Naples, or the Peninsula.

But if you're complaining about things like noise, funny smells, and cucarachas, don't live in a real downtown, urban environment, like Downtown Long Beach will always be.

And the demolition of Acres of Books is exactly the type of "renewal" that will make the downtown character "sterile and boring," but with the noise, funny smells, and cucarachas.

I propose we change our fair city's name. Who wants something as plebeian as "Long Beach"? There's already one in NYC, and clearly we haven't achieved the cache so desperately longed for by our city officials. Perhaps we should change our name to Adreanopolis. Doesn't that sound oh so Eurosophisticate? And everyone will address each other as Adreana. And we'll be the first city in America to establish English as our official language, publicly enforceable by law.
If you really want to get friendly with your neighbors and break down those language barriers, you could start with a smile and some eye contact.
The homeless are already displaced, but that's okay because who notices them anyway, right, Adreana? Let's displace the families that are already struggling and living in squalor, trapped by low pay, limited opportunity, slumlords, and lack of access to credit and healthcare. Not to mention the kind of education necessary to reverse sociological trends of poverty in minority populations. I like the way you think, Adreana. Why should we even attempt to clean up our neighborhood parks and turn them into safe places with adequate equipment when they serve just as well as places for drug deals and gang activity? Not to mention their service as dormitories for the homeless you so generously refrain from "distaining".
Of course you would like to live among the disabled and the elderly. They don't make a lot of noise, since they either shuffle or just wheel themselves about on rubber tires. And best of all, they die very quietly. No fuss, just a little smell until the mortician arrives.
You don't want to live in a city, Adreana, you want to live in a graveyard. I know you'll find your plot, and there you can pipe in Kenny G's Holiday Album for your undisturbed eternity.

You're right. No opportunity or access to anything in America. Free education, free emergency rooms, food stamps. Freedom to start any business you'd like. Absolutely correct. It's a wonder anyone can survive in this country. The reason people struggle has nothing to do with poor choices they've made.

Ergo, if you're struggling, you've made poor choices.

We're all born equally smart, able, with a stable family environment, and have the same opportunities from day one.

Seriously, some folks are lazy, some are a-holes, some are Lowenthals, but most are not.

Now back to the topic.

We all struggle at times. My objection was to your claim that people have limited opportunity. The fact that one lives in this great country means you have unlimited opportunity.

It's not that hard to stay out of poverty. If you don't do drugs, get a part time job in high school to start building a network, graduate from high school, and refrain from having children until you're married (ideally after age 25), there is an overwhelming liklihood that you won't be struggling in poverty. You may not be wealthy, but you'll get by just fine.

So yes, some are born on third base and some are born on first, but we All have the opportunity to get home if we make relatively easy choices.

Hey Foodle Pinkerstein, if your comment is all that why don't you put your real name on it rather than an attack name. My name is Adreana Langston and I completely stand by what I wrote. I spent five years living in an apartment two blocks from Lake Merrit in an Oakland neighborhoo called Adams Point. Me, an African-American woman and my boyfriend, a White man, fit in great there. There was a neighborhood group that was attempting to stop the Oakland City Council from permitting any more half way houses in the Adams Point. Adams Point had the highest density of half way houses for ex-cons, those in recovery for substance abuse and the mentally challenged. So this was not a neighborhood where everyone looked the same or was coming from the same socioeconomic background. It was economically diverse, it was ethnically diverse, it had plenty of gays and lesbians and it had the best looking children I've seen in any neighborhood due to the large percentage of mix-raced couples. It was a lot denser than 90802 yet it did not have the problems I listed in my previous post to even 1/5 the degree. It was not a perfect neighborhood by far. I loved it. The people were cool and neighborly. I didn't leave because I was sick of anything. I left because I wanted to be closer to my folks in Long Beach. You don't know enough about me to accuse me of wanting sterility in a neighborhood. And since I said nothing nasty about you or any of the posters, it lessens your credibility as a poster to come at me with nastiness. I didn't even say anything nasty about my 90802 neighbors, I listed specific behaviors of which I am sick, not specific people or classes or people or types of people. What's more I stated outright that I think only 20% of the 90802 neighbors are responsible for 100% of the behaviors of which I am sick. Andy, you weren't nasty but your accusations regarding the type of neighborhood for which I am looking are just as inaccurate.

Re: #21 Um, no. Life is not like the movie Trading Places. That's the most oversimplified bunch of libertarian claptrap I've ever heard. You actually believe that?

Re: #22 Um, huh? Thanks for the life story, but what is your point? "Mixed-raced" couples have prettier children? That's the stupidest thing I've heard since #21. And it's actually not "denser" than 90802. And...

But, again the point of the posts is not that downtown can't get better (someday we'll have as many "Whole Foods" as Adams Point), but that we don't need to get rid of everything that's given Long Beach it's unique character.

Oakland and Long Beach have a lot in common. They are both port cities. They have the same size population. They are listed in the last census as the first and second most diverse cities in the United States. Comparing Adams Point to downtown Long Beach in order to argue against finkerstein's and your inaccurate assessment of my previous post is, in my opinion, relevant. Adams Point had economic diversity, architectural diversity, gender identity diversity, and racial diversity. All of this added to its unique character. I loved Adams Point WITH all that diversity. The posts of you and finkelstein would describe me as someone who wants what you describe as the sterility and sameness of a cookie-cutter Orange County neighborhood. By bringing up Adams Point I was showing that description to be inaccurate. Adams Point was a very urban environment and I was cut out for it just fine, despite what you wrote about me on June 11th.

And what Finkelstein wrote in response to my post is inaccurate in regards to the struggling class. He/She lists all the obstacles and challenges that face lower income residence of 90802 from lack of access to affordable healthcare to lack of access to quality education. I don't argue that point. But here's the thing. I went to Catalina Island something like 3 years ago. I took a bus tour that included showing the "back end" of Catalina Island where the people live who do all the low paying service jobs. The housing stock was crappy but let me tell you what I looked for and DID NOT see:

I saw dogs in people's yards but I did not see dog feces on public areas like sidewalks.
I did not see graffitti.
I heard no blaring music coming out of cars or home windows. In fact some people were on their front porch enjoying music from a boombox but the sound of the music was at a reasonable decimal so it couldn't be heard in the bus.
I saw that the sidewalks were cracked and the streets had potholes but they were not strewn with trash.

It is absolutely insulting to suggest that being poor and/or uneducated automatically leads to having bad manners and being unneighborly. A lot of the low wage workers on Catalina Island that I saw had brown and black skin. From their skin color and their low wage jobs I am assuming that they faced the challenges Finkelstein described and yet their neighborhood did not display the unneighborly behavior of which I am tired in my neighborhood. One does not need a college degree and a professional salary to pick up after one's dog and not throw candy wrappers and soda cans on the street and walk one's children to Chavez Park rather than letting them play dangerously in a vacant lot. Nothing about the very real obstacles and challenges faced by those in 90802 is an excuse for the ghetto behavior of 15-20% of the residents. 90802 can keep its unique character just fine without keeping all the ghetto elements.

I went to Dictionary.com and looked up "denser". It is an adjective. Definition number 1 is "1. having the component parts closely compacted together; crowded or compact: a dense forest; dense population." . Adams Point does have more people per square mile than does 90802, even with the open space of Lake Merritt. So why did you make the statement that Adams Point is not "denser"?

I did not mention disable neighbors and senior neighbors in the abstract. Queens Terrance on 4th and Cedar and the Beach Wood apartments at 475 West 5th are specifically for disabled people. The highrise that shares the block with First Congregational Church and the Mexican Restaurant is specifically for seniors. I walk a lot passed those three buildings. What little vegetation there is in front of those buildings hardly ever has trash in it. When people coming out of those buildings are walking dogs I almost always can see that they have a bag with them to clean up after the dog. The people always smile and speak if you smile and speak to them. I NEVER see the residents of these buildings smoking cigarettes in front of the building then just throwing the butt on the ground (I see that so much in 90802 and it annoys me). I was talking about preferring seniors and disable people as neighbors because of experience that I've actually had living next to neighbors like these. By stating that because I'd prefer these neighbors what I'd really prefer is to live in a graveyard is to insinuate that disable and senior people are not vital or active. That is a nasty thing to say about disable people and senior people. First Congregational Church has disable and senior congregants who live in 90802 and there is nothing unvital or unactive about them.

Just one last thing. In my opinion mixed-race children are prettier (girls)/ more handsome (boys). That's my opinion. Since beauty and "adorableness" is in the eyes of the beholder why would you consider my opinion about mixed race children stupid? If you don't think they are better looking, that is your opinion and you are welcome to it. Why would an opinion that can not possibly be based on fact (since it is about what one person considers beautiful) be stupid? I was just mentioning that as one of the many things I liked about Adams Point's diversity.

Well, first of all, Oakland has the Raiders. So, it's always got that handicap.

Secondly, you said "it had the best looking children I’ve seen in any neighborhood due to the large percentage of mix-raced couples." That was your opinion and I'm calling you out on that. I think it's an idiotic opinion, because it was in the context of "what makes a nice neighborhood." Rhetorical discourse 101.

I think all children are beautiful and well-behaved ones make a nice neighborhood, it doesn't matter if they're green, four-eyed, or, unfortunately (in your opinion), not mixed-race. And unlike you, I can actually communicate with the non-English speaking ones.

As for density, averaging the FOUR zip codes that make up downtown Long Beach, you get 12507 folks per sq mile. This includes the whole Pike area which doesn't have a lot of residents. Averaging the TWO zip codes for Adams Point gives you 8872, which if you believe in Math, is less dense.

Again, you're the one labelling folks...I don't give a crap about what people look like