Don’t believe that informed people won’t think less of gordon and his union after their sorry bail-out.

Don’t believe that informed people won’t think less of gordon and his union after their sorry bail-out.

I know Teachers who I would bet are amazing with their classroom kids, who have devoted years to teaching, who support TALB to this day. They tell me they would have had the 1% non-retroactive raise had it not been for TALB, when they received the 4% retroactive raise. I feel our Teachers are way underpaid, and it infuriated me that the LBUSD wanted to shortchange them the last time around. Additionally, the proposal for an “Inspector General” in the LBUSD made a lot of sense. Too bad the powers that be aren’t interested in someone looking over their shoulder. See what Laura Doud is accomplishing in the city?

You were in Mexico too long to understand this in a big picture sense. The Chamber has always been a loser until 2007, with many losses, and most always thought that a Chamber endorsment was the kiss of death. They were contunally defeated until the unions had other things to do than support the policies monetarily. This “win” was a lucky draw for the chamber, as all Chamber insiders were girding for a loss with labor peace agreement and the wal-mart deal. Just ask anybody on the inside of the Chamber how confident they were before Schipske pulled her vote.

As for Ellis, this is not a loss for Gordon. They have lost before, but they pound it into the ground until they can’t go anymore, then they spin it into a win. No, this was a calculated win for them. The only reason why the Chamber came out on top in the School Board elections is because MIchael Ellis is on the Board.

WIthout Michael Ellis, TALB is stronger. On the board, TALB is weak and split. The Chamber needs Michael Ellis.

I like you Dave, but trust someone who has been around, this was a calculated decision. The day before the election, the Chamber was still ready to pump money intogetting signatures. They need, and want Ellis on the board.

I know Teachers who I would bet are amazing with their classroom kids, who have devoted years to teaching, who support TALB to this day. They tell me they would have had the 1% non-retroactive raise had it not been for TALB, when they received the 4% retroactive raise. I feel our Teachers are way underpaid, and it infuriated me that the LBUSD wanted to shortchange them the last time around. Additionally, the proposal for an “Inspector General” in the LBUSD made a lot of sense. Too bad the powers that be aren’t interested in someone looking over their shoulder. See what Laura Doud is accomplishing in the city?

You were in Mexico too long to understand this in a big picture sense. The Chamber has always been a loser until 2007, with many losses, and most always thought that a Chamber endorsment was the kiss of death. They were contunally defeated until the unions had other things to do than support the policies monetarily. This “win” was a lucky draw for the chamber, as all Chamber insiders were girding for a loss with labor peace agreement and the wal-mart deal. Just ask anybody on the inside of the Chamber how confident they were before Schipske pulled her vote.

As for Ellis, this is not a loss for Gordon. They have lost before, but they pound it into the ground until they can’t go anymore, then they spin it into a win. No, this was a calculated win for them. The only reason why the Chamber came out on top in the School Board elections is because MIchael Ellis is on the Board.

WIthout Michael Ellis, TALB is stronger. On the board, TALB is weak and split. The Chamber needs Michael Ellis.

I like you Dave, but trust someone who has been around, this was a calculated decision. The day before the election, the Chamber was still ready to pump money intogetting signatures. They need, and want Ellis on the board.

Regardless, I’m glad we agree that the real source of our educational problems is bad parents. Parents who value education have children who value education.

Regardless, I’m glad we agree that the real source of our educational problems is bad parents. Parents who value education have children who value education.